Teams

GEPTA/Adult 2.5W/Hufft/FB

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 2.67 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA SPRING ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.23 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ana Navedo
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
Delfina Lechuga
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.23
Adriana Ludwig
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Felma Ramirez
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #1 Singles 23% · published
Jennifer Derrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kara Hurd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mabel Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Magdlyn St-Cyr
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Melissa Hufft
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 19% · published
Monica Pineda
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sonia Ramirez
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 19% · published
Sylvia Anaya
usually #1 Doubles 85%, also #3 Doubles 15% · published
Victoria Torres
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mabel Evans + Adriana Ludwig1634% gamesnot enough data
Kara Hurd + Monica Pineda1542% gamesnot enough data
Mabel Evans + Sonia Ramirez1539% gamesnot enough data
Magdlyn St-Cyr + Sylvia Anaya224 matchesnot enough data
Ana Navedo + Sylvia Anaya213 matchesnot enough data
Felma Ramirez + Kara Hurd123 matchesnot enough data
Felma Ramirez + Sonia Ramirez123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Ana Navedo
18W–13L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Delfina Lechuga
14W–55L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Adriana Ludwig
4W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Felma Ramirez
7W–24L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Derrick
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kara Hurd
10W–26L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mabel Evans
2W–40L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Magdlyn St-Cyr
12W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hufft
98W–71L career · 21 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Pineda
6W–31L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sonia Ramirez
16W–31L career · 16 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sylvia Anaya
12W–12L career · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria Torres
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.