Teams

CC Bananas 8.0M

2025 USTA CC Summer Adult 65 & OVER · CC USTA 65 & OVER 8.0M

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-04vs CC-LLW -SLOverheads 8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesVan Ribultan / Gordon Ewing vs Donald Blessen / Jeff Rowan5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBill Wesnousky / Dennis Richardson vs Daniel Lambert / Michael Stanton0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Freeberg / David Rodgers vs Scott Cleere / Howard Nicholson6-2, 6-2
2025-09-13vs CC-LLW -SLOverheads 8.0MLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Rodgers / Bruce Freeberg vs Daniel Lambert / Michael Stanton2-6, 2-4
L#2 DoublesVan Ribultan / David Johns vs Scott Cleere / Howard Nicholson1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJim Muscarella / Bill Wesnousky vs Fred Kelley / Jeff Rowan0-6, 0-6
2025-08-16vs CC-LLW -SLOverheads 8.0MLost 02
L#2 DoublesDavid Rodgers / Dennis Richardson vs Donald Blessen / Daniel Lambert4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesVan Ribultan / Bill Wesnousky vs Tai Martin / Howard Nicholson2-6, 2-6
2025-08-09vs CC-LLW -SLOverheads 8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesBruce Freeberg / David Rodgers vs Donald Blessen / Scott Cleere2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBen Combs / Jim Muscarella vs Howard Nicholson / Jeff Rowan6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGordon Ewing / Bill Wesnousky vs Daniel Lambert / Tai Martin0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CC USTA 65 & OVER 8.0M have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Ben Combs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Bruce Freeberg
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
David Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.70
Gordon Ewing
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Dennis Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.05
Bill Wesnousky
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jim Muscarella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Van Ribultan
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bruce Freeberg + David Rodgers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ben Combs
1W–0L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Bruce Freeberg
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
David Rodgers
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Gordon Ewing
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Dennis Richardson
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.45
3.5
Bill Wesnousky
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jim Muscarella
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Van Ribultan
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.