Teams

Sunpro-Allen/Seegmiller

2024 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 4.5W AM

16 players · average NTRP 4.36 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-31Won 10
W#1 DoublesKaori Allen / Cindy Whip vs Staci McCubbins / Jennifer Rasmussen6-0, 6-2
2024-05-20vs Sports Mall-Kasteler/SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesKimberly Clawson / Cindy Whip vs Ashley Park / Karin Smith4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTyra Cook / Sue Curtis vs JaNae Smith / Marissa Jackson7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarci Seegmiller / Nancy Kirk vs Linda Marz / Jennifer Hathaway7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-05-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesKristi Dial / Sue Curtis vs Stephanie Tonin / Lisa Sterbenz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-05-06vs Ivory Ridge-Langston/ConradSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKimberly Clawson / Cindy Whip vs Jen Langston / Tanya Conrad6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMarci Seegmiller / Kaori Allen vs Tricia Sederberg / Rachelle Tempest7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesKimberly Clawson / Cindy Whip vs Amy Woolley / Karina Herman6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTyra Cook / Cambria Cook vs Lynn Kokkola-Woodbury / Leslie Barrowes6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-KempLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaori Allen / Marci Seegmiller vs Jessica Olsen / Emily Bott6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKristi Dial / Sue Curtis vs Kathy Miller-Rees / Lee Chase6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-19vs Sports Mall-Kasteler/SmithWon 21
L#1 DoublesKimberly Clawson / Kaori Allen vs Marissa Jackson / Marie Roberts3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarci Seegmiller / Kristi Dial vs Robyn Scharman / Regina Johnson6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Kirk / Tyra Cook vs JaNae Smith / Casey Pickett7-6, 6-2
2024-04-08Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristi Dial / Kimberly Clawson vs Arashan Heikkila / Tracey Valentine4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarci Seegmiller / Belinda Jensen vs Brook Vietor / Wendy Widerburg2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Kimberly Clawson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Cambria Cook
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Cindy Whip
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Marci Seegmiller
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.12
Kaori Allen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Meghan Clark
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.05
Sue Curtis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.03
Christy Davidson
published 4.5
3.91
Kristi Dial
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.87
Belinda Jensen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.86
Tyra Cook
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.85
Adrienne Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.79
Megan Warren
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
3.52
Shelli Johnston
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4
Nancy Kirk
published
Tami Austin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Davidson + Nancy Kirk9266% games+15.6% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Marci Seegmiller4158% games+12.8% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Kaori Allen11167% games+9.8% vs expected
Cindy Whip + Kimberly Clawson5261% games+7.8% vs expected
Meghan Clark + Marci Seegmiller5165% games+7.2% vs expected
Kristi Dial + Kimberly Clawson20459% games+3.9% vs expected
Kaori Allen + Kristi Dial7257% games+3.9% vs expected
Belinda Jensen + Shelli Johnston2449% games+1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kimberly Clawson
75W–42L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Cambria Cook
32W–11L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Cindy Whip
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Marci Seegmiller
92W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.20
4.5
Kaori Allen
119W–45L career · 4 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
4.12
Meghan Clark
56W–54L career · 5 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
4.05
Sue Curtis
49W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Christy Davidson
37W–27L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
4.03
4.5
Kristi Dial
58W–44L career · 4 lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
3.91
4
Belinda Jensen
147W–92L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Tyra Cook
43W–41L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
4.5
Adrienne Davis
56W–59L career · 8 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
3.85
Megan Warren
111W–121L career · 10 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Shelli Johnston
113W–105L career · type A · 10 lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
Nancy Kirk
62W–28L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tami Austin
31W–25L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.