Teams

CIN X18 6.0 CRC Kennedy

Winter USTA Central Indiana Mixed 18 & Over · CIN Indy Mixed 18 & Over 6.0, W

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-08vs CIN X18 6.0 IRCD AungLost 12
W#1 DoublesAllison Meyer / Joe Schuster vs Elizabeth Smart / Thu Han Aung6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichael Phillips / Angie Terry vs Jacob Ruchotzke / Chenae Reynolds6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKelleen Kennedy / Kiyoshi Matsuo vs Mike Hiemenz / Megan Madia2-6, 0-6
2025-03-07vs CIN X18 6.0 IRCD MooreSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAllison Meyer / Joe Schuster vs Caitlin Byczko / Sean Fitzgerald6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTony Link / Anna Ristow vs David Katz / Abigail Katz5-7, 3-6
2025-02-21vs CIN/Puckett/X18&Over6.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKelleen Kennedy / Kiyoshi Matsuo vs Adam Southerland / Kari Huddleston1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Wojcicki / Ryan Davis vs Edward Escasa / Becky Seybert2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTony Link / Viviane Williams vs Drew Darby / Beth Whitsett3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-14vs CIN X18 6.0 IRCD MooreLost 03
L#1 DoublesAllison Meyer / Kiyoshi Matsuo vs Caitlin Byczko / Jared Byczko3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAngie Terry / Michael Phillips vs David Katz / Abigail Katz6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnna Ristow / Ryan Davis vs Jacob Williams / Delaney Williams3-6, 2-6
2025-02-09vs CIN/Puckett/X18&Over6.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKelleen Kennedy / Ryan Davis vs Chris Paberzs / Shelby Paberzs0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTony Link / Anna Ristow vs Drew Darby / Melissa Patterson1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Meyer / Joe Schuster vs Andrew Goth / Katherine Goth3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-07vs CIN X18 6.0 IRCD AungLost 03
L#1 DoublesKiyoshi Matsuo / Anna Ristow vs Quincy Sauer / Jacob Ruchotzke2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Phillips / Viviane Williams vs Abigail Mills / Thu Han Aung6-3, 4-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJoe Schuster / Susan Wojcicki vs Chris Delp / Heidi Arnold2-6, 3-6
2025-01-31vs CIN/Puckett/X18&Over6.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Phillips / Susan Wojcicki vs Chris Paberzs / Beth Whitsett2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKiyoshi Matsuo / Viviane Williams vs Edward Escasa / Becky Seybert1-6, 3-6
2025-01-24vs CIN X18 6.0 IRCD MooreLost 02
L#1 DoublesAnna Ristow / Tony Link vs Jared Byczko / Caitlin Byczko3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAngie Terry / Kiyoshi Matsuo vs Tara Moore / Kyle Ratliff2-6, 1-6
2025-01-17vs CIN X18 6.0 IRCD AungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTony Link / Anna Ristow vs Quincy Sauer / Jacob Ruchotzke6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Phillips / Angie Terry vs Reuben Manoharan / Veronica Mercke6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · CIN Indy Mixed 18 & Over 6.0, W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CIN/Puckett/X18&Over6.08121616194
2CIN X18 6.0 IRCD Moore54151228240
3CIN X18 6.0 IRCD Aung54131433239
4CIN X18 6.0 CRC Kennedy0952246288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Allison Meyer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.97
Anna Ristow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.96
Kiyoshi Matsuo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Susan Wojcicki
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Kelleen Kennedy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Angie Terry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Viviane Williams
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joe Schuster
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Tony Link
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Ristow + Tony Link61445% gamesnot enough data
Kelleen Kennedy + Kiyoshi Matsuo1728% gamesnot enough data
Allison Meyer + Kiyoshi Matsuo5356% gamesnot enough data
Susan Wojcicki + Tony Link5355% gamesnot enough data
Allison Meyer + Joe Schuster7061% gamesnot enough data
Angie Terry + Kiyoshi Matsuo0625% gamesnot enough data
Viviane Williams + Kiyoshi Matsuo3243% gamesnot enough data
Angie Terry + Joe Schuster213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allison Meyer
101W–42L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.55
3
Anna Ristow
79W–71L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Kiyoshi Matsuo
13W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
2.96
Susan Wojcicki
52W–73L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kelleen Kennedy
36W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
3
Angie Terry
28W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
2.64
Viviane Williams
25W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%24%76%
2.59
Joe Schuster
11W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tony Link
18W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.