Teams

CSRC REYNOLDS

2025 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - SOCO · MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-06vs LTFCS OSTLYWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Swarmer / Chana Kolman vs Jenn Hull / Chad Houchin6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-22vs CCW WARDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Wooten / Debra VanDeVeer vs Melissa Holler / Rick Sundahl6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChana Kolman / John Swarmer vs William Tostanoski / Callie Scott4-6, 0-6
2025-06-15vs CSRC SCOTTLost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Bayuk / Chana Kolman vs MARY SCOTT / Steven Fair2-6, 2-6
2025-06-08vs FHCS BOEHMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Reynolds / Kim Weston vs Brian Priest / Alyssa Priest7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-01vs LTFCS OSTLYLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoy Giddens / Debra VanDeVeer vs Chad Houchin / Erin Reed6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKim Weston / Michael Reynolds vs Todd Goldstein / Jenn Hull4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-05-31vs CSRC SCOTTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRoy Giddens / Debra VanDeVeer vs Mary Beth Yockey / Dan Campos4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKim Weston / Michael Reynolds vs MARY SCOTT / David Palazzo2-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Miyo Park
published
3.05
Kim Weston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.04
Roy Giddens
published
2.98
Michael Reynolds
published
2.95
Chana Kolman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
David Wooten
published 3
2.89
Stacey Self
published
2.77
Debra VanDeVeer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
John Swarmer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra VanDeVeer + David Wooten4355% games+3.2% vs expected
Chana Kolman + Michael Reynolds5165% gamesnot enough data
Kim Weston + Michael Reynolds3265% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miyo Park
30W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Kim Weston
78W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Roy Giddens
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.04
Michael Reynolds
33W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
3
Chana Kolman
62W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
David Wooten
17W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Stacey Self
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Debra VanDeVeer
48W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
John Swarmer
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.