Teams

LTFC BLUE

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 2.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-13vs SKY GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathleen Bisaccia / Sheryl Rose vs Silke Larson / Jocelyn Murphy2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLaurie McElroy vs Joelle Klein6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMollie Anderson / Nicki Erdle vs Christine Atkinson / Jennifer Pearson0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBritta Beblavi / Maria Jump vs Jennifer Fitzgerald / Beth Godzich6-7, 2-6
2026-07-06vs VC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSheryl Rose / Elena Ellcessor vs Merrell Aspin / Megan Kane1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMollie Anderson / Kathleen Bisaccia vs Kate Patton / Annie Cordova6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNicki Erdle / Maria Jump vs Elizabeth Likovich / Catie Grimes5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-06-29vs CHCC REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKathleen Bisaccia / Laurie McElroy vs Allison Stassen / Casey Brittain2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesSheryl Rose vs Carlee Steck6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMollie Anderson / Elena Ellcessor vs Dana France / Sarah Teeters6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Jump / Nicki Erdle vs Allison Perkins / Heather Sabatier2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-06-22vs EM BLUEWon 31
W#1 DoublesSheryl Rose / Elena Ellcessor vs Jennifer Welte / Beth Toth6-2, 7-5
W#1 SinglesMollie Anderson vs Stephanie Sciez6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBritta Beblavi / Melissa Pace vs Lisa Ide / Hillary Cecil2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNicki Erdle / Jennifer Matheson vs Joy Jensen / Brooke Bolinske2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-15vs GAC REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaurie McElroy / Britta Beblavi vs Rebecca Givens / Ruth Mantle7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElena Ellcessor vs Lesley Baker6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathleen Bisaccia / Melissa Pace vs Anne Campbell / Amy Walsh1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Jump / Jennifer Matheson vs Kris Stern / Sarah Younggren6-7, 0-6
2026-06-08vs GCC NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesBritta Beblavi / Kathleen Bisaccia vs Taylor Haywood / Christine Viney2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesLaurie McElroy vs Meghan Callaway6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMelissa Pace / Mollie Anderson vs Kathryn Briggs / Rebecca Orcutt2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaria Jump / Jennifer Matheson vs Ilana Larson / Marissa Sproles6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2026-06-01vs ATC REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElena Ellcessor / Laurie McElroy vs Darcee Mauger / Whitney Groth7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSheryl Rose vs Sarah Pucillo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Bisaccia / Jennifer Matheson vs Barbara Fraser / Lina Wong-Kuljis2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBritta Beblavi / Maria Jump vs Allison Dodge / Kim Bolt7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Laurie McElroy
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.96
Sheryl Rose
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.87
Elena Ellcessor
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.84
Nicki Erdle
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.74
Maria Jump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.69
Britta Beblavi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Mollie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
2.59
Kathleen Bisaccia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.38
Melissa Pace
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Jennifer Matheson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Britta Beblavi + Laurie McElroy131552% games+4.5% vs expected
Elena Ellcessor + Kathleen Bisaccia224 matchesnot enough data
Elena Ellcessor + Sheryl Rose224 matchesnot enough data
Nicki Erdle + Kathleen Bisaccia314 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Bisaccia + Britta Beblavi134 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Matheson + Maria Jump123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Bisaccia + Sheryl Rose213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laurie McElroy
62W–62L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Sheryl Rose
29W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Elena Ellcessor
62W–36L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Nicki Erdle
89W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
2.5
Maria Jump
75W–51L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%5%95%
2.74
3
Britta Beblavi
26W–41L career · 5 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Mollie Anderson
18W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Kathleen Bisaccia
45W–50L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
2.59
Melissa Pace
3W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.38
Jennifer Matheson
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.