Teams

Adams-TBA

2025 Mixed 40 & Over-DLT · 3.5 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-07-10vs TrammellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTim Tyler / Melissa Hazlewood vs Floyd Trammell / Mary Hairston6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeigh Street / Raymond Emerson vs Joel Wells / Paula Wells4-6, 4-6
2025-06-25vs TrammellWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Ashford / Susan Adams vs Floyd Trammell / Pam Miller6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWilliam Smith / Tracy Etheridge vs Robert Curry / Rene Morlino6-1, 6-2
2025-06-04vs TrammellWon 21
L#1 DoublesPaul Lyon / Robin Toler vs Robert Curry / Pam Miller6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeremy Foster / Diane Chenault vs Floyd Trammell / Rene Morlino6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRaymond Emerson / Leigh Street vs Joel Wells / Paula Wells6-4, 6-4
2025-05-21vs TrammellWon 20
W#1 DoublesPaul Ashford / Susan Adams vs Floyd Trammell / Pam Miller6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRaymond Emerson / Leigh Street vs Joel Wells / Paula Wells6-4, 6-4
2025-05-19vs TrammellWon 20
W#1 DoublesTim Tyler / Melissa Hazlewood vs Floyd Trammell / Mary Hairston6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesWilliam Smith / Tracy Etheridge vs Robert Curry / Rene Morlino6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Adams-TBA50132457
2Trammell0521327175

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Jeremy Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Robin Toler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Melissa Hazlewood
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Paul Lyon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Diane Chenault
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.64
Tracy Etheridge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Leigh Street
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Ashford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Raymond Emerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Street + Raymond Emerson4159% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeremy Foster
14W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Robin Toler
25W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Melissa Hazlewood
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
Paul Lyon
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3.5
Diane Chenault
11W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.72
Tracy Etheridge
28W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%15%85%
2.64
Leigh Street
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
Paul Ashford
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Emerson
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.