Teams

MacAttack 3.5 (40+)

2021 Howard-Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2021-08-02vs Ladies of the Net 3.5 (40+)Split 11
L#1 SinglesKaren Spano vs Amy LaMoure0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Debra MacDonald vs Holly M Beck / Linda Ginsburg6-2, 6-0
2021-07-28vs Casual Sets (40+)Won 20
W#1 SinglesRosalba Davis vs Lorra Baker6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Hok / Debra MacDonald vs Pamela Mary Gogol / Linda Morris6-3, 6-2
2021-07-21vs Happy HittingWon 30
W#1 SinglesCora Ho vs Karlene Brathwaite6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Debra MacDonald vs Terri Windsor / Rachele Stines6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMillette Miller / Elizabeth Hok vs Alecia Brinkley / Danyelle Taylor6-4, 5-4
2021-07-15vs Will play for Chardonnay (40+)Won 20
W#2 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Laura Haney vs Ilene Fishkind / Risa Snyder6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Richards / Elizabeth Hok vs Amy Cooper / Amy Lovas6-2, 7-6
2021-07-05vs ShotmakersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennie Kim / Susan Rhee vs Jeanne Celtnieks / Linda Shojaei6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesRosalba Davis vs Sherry Chase1-6, 2-6
2021-06-27vs Vitamin T (40+)Won 30
W#1 SinglesRosalba Davis vs Amy Cohen6-4, 5-6
W#2 DoublesDebra MacDonald / Laura Haney vs Kimberly LaRose / Shelley Swaim6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Spano / Evelyn Chan vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-23vs Oaksmith 3.5 (40+)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennie Kim / Susan Rhee vs Kathryn Broadbent / Missy Burke6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesClaire Rossmark vs Jill Rose1-6, 0-6
2021-06-15Split 11
W#1 SinglesRosalba Davis vs Sharon Weston-Dawkes6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesClaire Rossmark / Karen Spano vs Mary Barall / Sheryl Gold6-7, 3-2, 0-1
2021-06-07vs Super SmashWon 20
W#1 SinglesCora Ho vs Julia Heeter6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Richards / Elizabeth Hok vs Marie Kerins / Julia Kogan6-2, 6-1
2021-06-04vs Rally Girls 3.5 (40+)Won 21
W#1 SinglesDebra MacDonald vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Haney / Esther Wang vs Karin Johansen / Cindy Keegan6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRosalba Davis / Claire Rossmark vs Betty Wang / Brenda Poore7-6, 2-5
2021-06-02vs Sets in the City (40+)Split 11
W#1 DoublesJennie Kim / Susan Rhee vs Christine Driscoll / Donna Slaughter6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCora Ho / Elizabeth Hok vs Amy Dawson / Kellee Kramer4-6, 6-7
2021-05-15vs SmashedWon 30
W#1 SinglesClaire Rossmark vs Jillian Kingwood6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Stewart / Jennie Kim vs Colleen D'Agrosa / Shelly Chamness6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLaura Haney / Esther Wang vs Dina Rachuba / Kelly Treacy6-4, 6-6
2021-05-11vs SparksWon 20
W#1 SinglesCora Ho vs Katie Young6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClaire Rossmark / Debra MacDonald vs Anne Swartz / Marge Naviasky6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.90
Evelyn Chan
published 4
3.46
Erin Newsome Moltz
published 3.5
3.42
Rebecca Stewart
published
3.35
Jennie Kim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Laura Haney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Cora Ho
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.25
Claire Rossmark
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Elizabeth Hok
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Rosalba Davis
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Debra MacDonald
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.01
Esther Wang
published 3.5
2.88
Karen Spano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Millette Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Haney + Debra MacDonald241455% games−2.3% vs expected
Karen Spano + Debra MacDonald2551% gamesnot enough data
Debra MacDonald + Elizabeth Hok4158% gamesnot enough data
Claire Rossmark + Elizabeth Hok314 matchesnot enough data
Jennie Kim + Cora Ho314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Evelyn Chan
22W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
3.5
Erin Newsome Moltz
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%61%39%
3.46
Rebecca Stewart
36W–20L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Jennie Kim
266W–126L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.35
Laura Haney
374W–273L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Cora Ho
120W–87L career · 7 lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Claire Rossmark
147W–165L career · 5 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elizabeth Hok
124W–134L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Rosalba Davis
38W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Debra MacDonald
213W–223L career · 11 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Esther Wang
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Karen Spano
88W–120L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
2.88
Millette Miller
7W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.