Teams

4 Woodlake Patterson 4.5

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.42 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesKen Patterson / Chris Grinnell vs Yong Ko / Dale Nowery6-4, 6-4
2022-05-29Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Grinnell / Drew Lineberger vs Eric Spivack / Terry Jahn6-4, 6-4
2022-05-15vs 5 Westwood Godsey 4.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Grinnell / Eric Estes vs Matthew Haga / Michael Baxter6-4, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDrew Lineberger / Chris Grinnell vs Bryant Mohns - (DQ) / Donnell Stewart6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChris Grinnell / Eric Estes vs Eric Spivack / Anthony Fiorenza4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-04-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Grinnell / Drew Lineberger vs Ben Hall / Duke Crane6-3, 6-3
2022-04-03vs 7 RidgeTop LefkowitzWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Grinnell / Eric Estes vs Michael Shafer / Adam Plotkin6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Novak
published 4.5
Bradley Glen
published 4.5
Drew Lineberger
published 4.5
4.18
Renato Mendoza
published
4.13
Eric Estes
published 4.5
4.07
Chris Grinnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.75
Tanner Allison
published
3.75
Wieslaw Gumulak
published
3.73
Ken Patterson
published
3.68
Donald Love
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wieslaw Gumulak + Ken Patterson134 matchesnot enough data
Renato Mendoza + Wieslaw Gumulak123 matchesnot enough data
Wieslaw Gumulak + Chris Grinnell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Novak
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Bradley Glen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Drew Lineberger
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Renato Mendoza
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Eric Estes
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Chris Grinnell
76W–55L career · 7 lines in 2022
29%71%<1%
4.07
Tanner Allison
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
97%3%<1%
3.75
Wieslaw Gumulak
9W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Ken Patterson
11W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Donald Love
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.