Teams

SD WE LLW HT Peninsula TC/ Yao

2025 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

18 players · average NTRP 4.38 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.68
Grace Yao
published
4.55
Shelby Rubin
published 5
4.51
Ana Seelinger
published 5
4.40
Nadine Utz
published 4.5
4.36
Alison Hagopian
published 4.5
4.29
Cynthia Herrera
published 4.5
4.26
Sheila Paguyo
published 4.5
4.12
Ashley Jay
published 4.5
4.09
Arianna Michaels
published 4.5
4.06
Natalie DeForest
published 4.5
4.06
3.90
Chloe Erikson
published 4
3.83
Grace Ogihara
published 4
3.81
Karen Nguyen
published
3.76
Laura Edmondson
published
3.72
Kristine Nguyen
published
3.33
Christine Pham
published 3.5
Megan Trentacosta
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claire Mittermiller + Grace Ogihara15758% games+12.2% vs expected
Ashley Jay + Nadine Utz7357% games−0.5% vs expected
Natalie DeForest + Chloe Erikson6355% gamesnot enough data
Shelby Rubin + Sheila Paguyo314 matchesnot enough data
Chloe Erikson + Grace Ogihara224 matchesnot enough data
Natalie DeForest + Nadine Utz303 matchesnot enough data
Shelby Rubin + Ana Seelinger213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Yao
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
5
Shelby Rubin
127W–47L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.55
5
Ana Seelinger
186W–59L career · no lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.51
4.5
Nadine Utz
207W–51L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
4.40
4.5
Alison Hagopian
171W–74L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
4.36
4.5
Cynthia Herrera
14W–11L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Sheila Paguyo
148W–65L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Ashley Jay
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Arianna Michaels
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Natalie DeForest
57W–20L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
4.06
4
Claire Mittermiller
81W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
4.06
4
Chloe Erikson
45W–24L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Grace Ogihara
69W–48L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.83
Karen Nguyen
6W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Laura Edmondson
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Kristine Nguyen
15W–3L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Christine Pham
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Megan Trentacosta
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.