← Teams

CGM-Rey

2019 Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Patricia Evola
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.76
Yumiko Pike
usually #3 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Linda Lovett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.58
Heidi Wilcox
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Becky Rey
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Deborah Borchers
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.09
Lisa Provost
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
—
Gale Volk
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 0
Results9 ties
2018-11-17Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Gale Volk vs Lisa Lynch / Janet Walker4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Tracy Bardell / Jennifer Hill4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2018-11-11Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Teresa Neal vs Jennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Patricia Evola vs Sue Gregoire / Mary Anderson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Gale Volk vs Janet Tabor / Andrea Bowen6-3, 6-3
2018-11-09Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesHeidi Wilcox / Michelle Day-Wirth vs Janet Tabor / Mary Anderson6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Teresa Neal vs Jennifer Devoe / Shannon Dilorenzo6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Becky Rey vs Lori Layne / Stacy Hawkins Parker4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2018-11-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesLinda Lovett / Lisa Provost vs Karen Mathews / Carol Woolman7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Gale Volk vs Tami Oglesby / June Wu6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Teresa Neal vs Debra Rifkin / Kim Hill6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2018-10-27Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Teresa Neal vs Janelle Laurila / Lisa Lyon2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesYumiko Pike / Gale Volk vs Tracy Bardell / Lisa Lynch7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatricia Evola / Linda Lovett vs Jennifer Hill / Amy Alpern3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2018-10-14Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Teresa Neal vs Karen Mathews / Sandy Garry6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBecky Rey / Linda Lovett vs Janine Paulson / Kim Hill6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Ginny Nichols vs Anne McCroskey / Karen Sullivan6-1, 6-0
2018-09-30Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesBecky Rey / Gale Volk vs Sue Gregoire / Mary Anderson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Deborah Borchers vs Gay Hart / Mary Kurz7-6, 7-5
2018-09-23Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Patricia Evola vs Sandy Garry / Carol Woolman6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGale Volk / Becky Rey vs Karen Mathews / Kim Hill6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesYumiko Pike / Lisa Provost vs Marie Picard / June Wu7-6, 7-5
2018-09-16Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKelly Sharkey / Heidi Wilcox vs Lisa Lyon / Jana Corder6-3, 3-2
L#2 DoublesDeborah Borchers / Yumiko Pike vs Jill Lee / Janet Walker6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGale Volk / Becky Rey vs Amy Alpern / Tracy Bardell6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Patricia Evola
26W–12L career
not enough data
—
4
Yumiko Pike
73W–97L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Linda Lovett
93W–105L career
4%96%0%
3.67
4
Heidi Wilcox
86W–87L career
15%85%0%
3.58
4
Becky Rey
26W–49L career
43%57%0%
3.47
4
Deborah Borchers
53W–101L career
46%54%0%
3.46
3.5
Lisa Provost
37W–120L career
19%81%0%
3.09
0
Gale Volk
15W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.