Teams

HRCA NAVY

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 4.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-06vs KC BLACKWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrandon Kalusa / Gregory Fraikor vs David Maas / Michael Lemar6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-08-30vs CCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesGregory Fraikor / Riley Huffer vs Phil Kelly / Robert McNamara6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGary Tussey / John Page vs Drew Damiano / Keith Robertson6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2022-08-23vs LEBTC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesPat Kim / Riley Huffer vs Jon Greenfield / Todd Campbell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSanil Budhdev / Robert Cochran vs Shawn Audino / Chris Heath6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-08-19vs KC BLUESplit 11
W#1 SinglesRiley Huffer vs Roger Bowers7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGary Tussey / Edward Kolb vs Chris Rogers / Mark Beelaert2-6, 2-6
2022-08-09vs SSG BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Ryan / Pat Kim vs Harry Dorcy / Ankit Koul6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBrandon Kalusa vs Timothy Roberge6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesEdward Kolb / Sanil Budhdev vs Joseph Gaiennie / Rich Rockwell6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-08-02vs KC BLACKWon 30
W#1 DoublesRiley Huffer / Pat Kim vs David Maas / Michael Wright6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBrandon Kalusa vs Michael Lemar7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRobert Cochran / Gary Tussey vs Reuben Ybarra / Gary Hosler6-3, 6-4
2022-07-31vs CCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesPat Kim / Brandon Kalusa vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesRiley Huffer vs Ben Huber3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdward Kolb / Gary Tussey vs Drew Damiano / Keith Robertson7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.02 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Kalusa
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.24
Pat Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Riley Huffer
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4.5
Gary Tussey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Gregory Fraikor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Edward Kolb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Sanil Budhdev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gregory Fraikor + Brandon Kalusa7064% games+9.9% vs expected
Edward Kolb + Gary Tussey2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brandon Kalusa
26W–5L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Pat Kim
36W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Riley Huffer
56W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
4
Gary Tussey
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Gregory Fraikor
33W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Edward Kolb
47W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.62
Sanil Budhdev
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.