Teams

Steed/Rice/Nashville

2025 Combo 18 & Over - Nashville · 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-10vs Sengvilay/NashvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesKatelyn Thorne / Natalie Geng vs Chiarra Jessey / Shaunielle Glen7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMonica Kenny / Lele Thompson vs Becky Sengvilay / Laura Beckert3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChelsea Rice / Anne Ammons vs Jennifer Gilkey / Sara Lindsay1-6, 1-6
2025-09-02vs Protz/Givens/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesKacey Passmore / Noelle Cotey vs Ashwini Kashelikar / Kelly Clapp6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClair Bartholomew / Jill Labetti vs Stephanie Protz / Mary Mouser7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMadeline Long / Victoria Marcella vs Sherri Givens / Ashley West4-6, 1-6
2025-08-26vs Cox/Davis/NashvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Spalding / Chelsea Rice vs Marjorie George / Amy Frankel Nau7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAshley Kennedy / Natalie Geng vs Sarah Kunz / Kelli Haywood6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesClair Bartholomew / Katelyn Thorne vs Joy Cox / Lauren Pollard2-6, 2-6
2025-08-19vs Beattie/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesNoelle Cotey / Allie Steed vs Navie Birdwell / Christina Beattie6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Spalding / Chelsea Rice vs Jennifer Frank / Nicole Gresham6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesLele Thompson / Monica Kenny vs Courtney Fraser-Mason / Lori Paranjape2-6, 5-7
2025-08-05vs Anderson/NashvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllie Steed / Ashley Kennedy vs Lauren Schmid / Tracy Aszkler6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKacey Passmore / Noelle Cotey vs Karolina Anderson / Catherine Devane6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClair Bartholomew / Madeline Long vs Louisa Bateman / Courtney Hendry-Williams6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women - Tuesday AM & PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Noelle Cotey
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Kacey Passmore
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Suzanne Spalding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Clair Bartholomew
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Katelyn Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.01
Chelsea Rice
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Allie Steed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Natalie Geng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Monica Kenny
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.80
Jill Labetti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Victoria Marcella
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Anne Ammons
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Lele Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Madeline Long
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Ammons + Monica Kenny10262% games+9.2% vs expected
Noelle Cotey + Kacey Passmore314 matchesnot enough data
Kacey Passmore + Chelsea Rice224 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Thorne + Victoria Marcella123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Cotey
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kacey Passmore
8W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Suzanne Spalding
36W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
3.5
Clair Bartholomew
18W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Katelyn Thorne
17W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3.5
Chelsea Rice
5W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Allie Steed
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Natalie Geng
25W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.92
Monica Kenny
21W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
Jill Labetti
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Victoria Marcella
7W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Anne Ammons
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Lele Thompson
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Madeline Long
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.