Teams

As.Grantham18S

2024 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-22vs La.Yopp18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Elizabeth Vieira3-6, 3-6
2024-07-15Lost 01
L#1 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Lauren Gray5-7, 0-6
2024-07-08vs Au.Beam18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Shanie Kpanay4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAshley Grantham vs Lauren Warren6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Kathryn Whatley3-6, 1-6
2024-06-24vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 20
W#1 SinglesAnnie Flowers vs Latoya Clay6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAshley Grantham vs Kaitlin Tucker6-1, 6-1
2024-06-17vs Sa.Highsmith18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Sally Highsmith1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Grantham vs Kristen Patch2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBelinda Berling vs Sarah Sims Chesson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-10vs Ta.Anthony18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesAnnie Flowers vs Jennifer Boney3-6, 1-6
2024-06-03vs St.Fogarty18S2.5Split 11
L#2 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Stephanie Fogarty2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 SinglesAnnie Flowers vs Heath Hilliker6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.70
Annie Flowers
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.61
Susie Albion
published
2.60
2.50
Ashley Grantham
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.42
Belinda Berling
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.36
Vickie Gibbs
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vickie Gibbs + Ashley Grantham1445% gamesnot enough data
Vickie Gibbs + Belinda Berling224 matchesnot enough data
Vickie Gibbs + Annie Flowers303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Annie Flowers
19W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Susie Albion
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.61
Mary Ellen Wetzler-Behar
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Ashley Grantham
36W–53L career · 3 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Belinda Berling
37W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%73%27%
2.42
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
54W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%84%16%
2.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.