Teams

TCSP-Au Yeung

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

1 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Adam Sherr
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
Results11 ties
2022-09-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Sherr / Jeremy Jones vs Corey West / Kevin Nielsen6-4, 6-1
2022-09-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Sherr / Jeremy Jones vs Paul Preston / Seth Yount6-1, 6-1
2022-09-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdam Sherr / Jeremy Jones vs Joshua Husbands / MICHAEL DOHERTY7-5, 7-5
2022-08-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdam Sherr / Ryan Hardie vs Fernando Martinez / Derrick Robb2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-05Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoss Bunker / Adam Sherr vs Adam Ortega / Richard Aylen6-4, 6-3
2022-05-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeremy Jones / Adam Sherr vs Suman Sadanand Narambrath / Ales Novak5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-05-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesAdam Sherr / Sydney Vinnedge vs Douglas Lane / Ruochen Wang6-2, 6-0
2022-05-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesAdam Sherr vs Dechuan Zhuang6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-04-23Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAdam Sherr vs Kapil Pruthi6-4, 6-1
2022-04-10Won 10
W#1 SinglesAdam Sherr vs Suresh Namala6-4, 7-6
2022-04-09Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAdam Sherr vs Jason LeeKeenan7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Adam Sherr
107W–94L career
0%99%0%
3.28

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.