Teams

Jones

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over-SW · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-23vs Tri-Level CalcoteLost 01
L#1 DoublesCortney Hodges / Leah Stewart vs Lindsey Abdalla / Becky Green3-6, 2-6
2026-07-23vs Tri-Level HarrisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesMary Lindsey Lumley / Charly Schmidt vs Lynn Taylor / Deanna Howington6-4, 6-2
2026-07-21vs Tri-Level HarrisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCourtney Owens / Cortney Hodges vs Dwana Wright / Laura Murray6-3, 6-3
2026-07-14vs LeggettWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharly Schmidt / Mary Lindsey Lumley vs Courtney Owens / Paige Sullivan7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2026-06-24vs Tri-Level CalcoteLost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Lindsey Lumley / Emily Lowery vs Lindsey Abdalla / Becky Green6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Taylor Berry
published
3.64
Kimberly McNeese
published
3.58
Mary Lindsey Lumley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Staci Anding
published
3.07
Leah Stewart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Cortney Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kara Chapman
published
Karlee Byrd
published
Meredith Miller
published
Terah Shelby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leah Stewart + Staci Anding5064% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly McNeese + Taylor Berry033 matchesnot enough data
Taylor Berry + Karlee Byrd123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Berry
11W–11L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Kimberly McNeese
10W–7L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
Mary Lindsey Lumley
26W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Staci Anding
26W–10L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Leah Stewart
15W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Cortney Hodges
18W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
3.00
Kara Chapman
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Karlee Byrd
7W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Meredith Miller
18W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Terah Shelby
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.