Teams

Wiles - Causing A Racket

2025 Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekend Women · Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-14vs Balis- MTC Tennis the MenaceWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Chang / Amanda Klukowski vs Paula Millian / Lynne Kaye6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesNatalia Simek vs Sophia Spytek7-5, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMadison Humerick / Robin Smith vs Wendy Andrews / Carolina Balis6-2, 6-4
2025-06-07vs MichaelsLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Patricia Neiss3-6, 1-6
2025-06-04vs Diley - Lethal lobbersWon 10
W#1 DoublesCasey Briglia / Stefanie Benson vs Hilary Gerhardt / Read Van De Water7-5, 7-5
2025-05-10vs Balis- MTC Tennis the MenaceWon 10
W#1 SinglesCarthina Marple vs Wendy Andrews6-2, 6-2
2025-04-19vs RutherWon 20
W#1 DoublesKelly Fedorchak / Brittany Wiles vs Courtney Miyashiro / Svetlana Yugova6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesNatalia Simek vs Anusha Prasad7-6, 6-4
2025-04-13vs Diley - Lethal lobbersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMadison Humerick / Brittany Wiles vs Hilary Gerhardt / Desiree Wing6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesKristin DeMasi vs Denisa Mendelsohn2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStefanie Benson / Jennifer Chang vs Terri Diley / Sue Bopp6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.76
Kelly Fedorchak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Madison Humerick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Natalia Simek
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Carthina Marple
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Brittany Wiles
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Casey Briglia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.21
Amanda Klukowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Kristin DeMasi
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.15
Jennifer Chang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amanda Klukowski + Jennifer Chang213 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Wiles + Casey Briglia213 matchesnot enough data
Natalia Simek + Kelly Fedorchak213 matchesnot enough data
Kristin DeMasi + Jennifer Chang033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Fedorchak
17W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Madison Humerick
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Natalia Simek
24W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
2.5
Carthina Marple
50W–87L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Brittany Wiles
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%78%22%
2.39
2.5
Casey Briglia
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%93%7%
2.30
2.5
Amanda Klukowski
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.21
Kristin DeMasi
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Jennifer Chang
9W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.