Teams

WC GOLD

2023 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 2.86 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-07-03vs CR-DC ORANGESplit 22
L#1 DoublesIsaac Herman / Michael Gagne vs DAVID DALESSANDRO / Mark Folsom6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTim Royal vs Scott Liestman3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCraig Masur / Whitney Schrandt vs Tom Jeffrey / Kelvin Southards6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRobert Parmer / Aaron Muhl vs William Bragg / David Lee6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Tim Royal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.87
Ian Falivene
published 3
2.77
Michael Gagne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
David Markenson
published 3
2.70
Craig Masur
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Robert Parmer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.68
Dave Schmitt
published 3
2.60
Whitney Schrandt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Brad Mosch
published 3
2.42
Jeff Milanovich
published
2.40
Isaac Herman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.39
Aaron Muhl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Masur + Whitney Schrandt11458% games+12.9% vs expected
Brad Mosch + Ian Falivene6059% games+9.4% vs expected
Michael Gagne + Tim Royal8461% games+7.2% vs expected
Isaac Herman + Craig Masur13950% games+4.7% vs expected
Isaac Herman + Michael Gagne3349% games+4.0% vs expected
Craig Masur + Michael Gagne4456% games+2.2% vs expected
Brad Mosch + Michael Gagne3348% games+1.7% vs expected
Brad Mosch + Whitney Schrandt1543% games−0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tim Royal
36W–18L career · 1 line in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3
Ian Falivene
39W–27L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
2.87
Michael Gagne
28W–35L career · 1 line in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
David Markenson
1W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Craig Masur
44W–68L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Robert Parmer
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Dave Schmitt
20W–30L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Whitney Schrandt
27W–56L career · 1 line in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Brad Mosch
19W–28L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jeff Milanovich
7W–51L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
2.42
2.5
Isaac Herman
25W–31L career · 1 line in 2023
0%78%22%
2.40
2.5
Aaron Muhl
15W–39L career · 1 line in 2023
0%81%19%
2.39

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.