Teams

B7 Raintree Stone

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-06-03vs B5 Avalon Ghita 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Stone / Edward Yesbeck vs Yan Wu / Derrick Wafford2-6, 4-6
2021-05-27vs B4 ACAC Stephens Assault 4.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Michael McMillen vs William Price / Gary Reinhardt2-6, 6-7
2021-05-13vs B6 MAC CousinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Stuart Dowdy vs Nathan Caudle / Adam Hamilton4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-26vs B3 Hermitage Fisher/StuckeyLost 01
L#1 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Matthew Earle vs Bart Nasta / Christopher Chandler4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weeknight Adult 18 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Geoff Campbell
published 4
3.79
Hamid Mahmood
published 4
3.77
Mahesh Sukumaran
published
3.77
Ram Raghavan
published
Gary Wills
published 4
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.67
Sanjeev Vohra
published
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.63
Joe Lacroix
published
3.47
Madhav Kidambi
published
3.30
Stuart Dowdy
published
3.26
Paul Haley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ram Raghavan + Mahesh Sukumaran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Geoff Campbell
14W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Hamid Mahmood
4W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.79
Mahesh Sukumaran
16W–15L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Ram Raghavan
9W–10L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Sanjeev Vohra
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.64
Joe Lacroix
7W–8L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.63
Madhav Kidambi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
3.47
Stuart Dowdy
15W–11L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Paul Haley
30W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.