Teams

SD 4.0 La Jolla TC (9AM)/ Watton

2025 SoCal Fall Doubles WE- San Diego · SD Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesAiden Arami / Jonathan Ross vs Alejandro Valdez / Raymond Tabuena6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaxwell Bosse / Andrew Linville vs Petar Racic / Breton Clark6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRaymond Herr / Leo Hu vs PIERRE CHATELAIN / Pete Saucedo2-6, 3-6
2025-12-07vs SD 4.0 Lake Murray TC (9AM)/ HillWon 21
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ross / Aiden Arami vs Jess Zlotnik / Derek Hulse3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMaxwell Bosse / Jc Abrahamson vs Seth Hill / Edward Grader2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeo Hu / Raymond Herr vs Andrew Gilcrest / Eyal Oren0-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ross / Andrew Linville vs Robert Alexander / Shores Salter6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRaymond Herr / Leo Hu vs Zhe Zhang / Jon Cieslak5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Zimmerman / Jc Abrahamson vs Alex Chin / Jerome Chang2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesAiden Arami / Jonathan Ross vs James Irwin / Oliver Thieler6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrew Linville / Maxwell Bosse vs Guela Sokhadze / Scott Rodd6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacob Watton / Raymond Herr vs Albert Chen / Stefano Santomauro2-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ross / Maxwell Bosse vs Richard Catlin / Myles Huck6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichael McKenna / Leo Hu vs Will Roth / Theodore Gilmore6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRaymond Herr / Brian Zimmerman vs Alex Fahrenthold / Jeremy HACKWORTH1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Aiden Arami
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andrew Linville
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jacob Watton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Brian Zimmerman
published 3.5
Jc Abrahamson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Leo Hu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Maxwell Bosse
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Raymond Herr
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leo Hu + Raymond Herr033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Aiden Arami
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Andrew Linville
3W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Jacob Watton
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brian Zimmerman
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Jc Abrahamson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leo Hu
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Maxwell Bosse
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Raymond Herr
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.