Teams

RIDGEMARK G&CC 18AW3.5A

2022 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Rachel Banse
published
3.42
Tracy Taggart
published
3.39
Diana Wheeler
published 3.5
3.32
Allison Rohnert
published 3.5
3.30
Tina Clark
published
Bailey Rianda
published 3.5
3.23
Kylee Waterman
published
3.20
Sandy Barker
published
3.19
Kristie Solomon
published
3.15
Dana Padilla
published 3.5
3.11
Lori Sortino
published
2.90
2.80
Diana M Sanchez
published 3
Luda Rosenberg
published
Luz Bachofer
published
Noreen Kakalec
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristie Solomon + Tina Clark314 matchesnot enough data
Sandy Barker + Tracy Taggart123 matchesnot enough data
Allison Rohnert + Kristie Solomon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Banse
14W–14L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Tracy Taggart
9W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Diana Wheeler
22W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Allison Rohnert
45W–48L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Tina Clark
20W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Bailey Rianda
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kylee Waterman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Sandy Barker
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.20
Kristie Solomon
29W–19L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dana Padilla
14W–16L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Lori Sortino
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Deborah Armstrong
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Diana M Sanchez
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Luda Rosenberg
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Luz Bachofer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Noreen Kakalec
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.