Teams

Leslie Echols

2024 Springfield Adult 18 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.60 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-10vs MO/Pell/18&Over3.5WLost 23
W#1 DoublesAlisa Blasdel / Hayley Plumlee vs Kim Vinton / Lorry Brown6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesHeather Maxey vs Kathy Drew1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelly Jones / Kimberly Mitrenga vs Donna Hoffmann / Tami Turner3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAndrea Fuentes vs Katherine Vandeven6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Mayr / Carolyn Hanger vs Debbie Pell / Tami Murphy0-6, 4-6
2024-06-03vs MO/Pell/18&Over3.5WWon 41
W#1 DoublesKelley Nosari / Alisa Blasdel vs Donna Hoffmann / Tami Turner6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLeah Coleman vs Kortney Wassam6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShelly Jones / Andrea Fuentes vs Katherine Vandeven / Elena Gable6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesHeather Maxey vs Stephanie Wachob3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMadison Noe / Jenika Hernandez vs Laura Greene-Johnson / Huong Doan0-6, 0-6
2024-05-20vs MO/Pell/18&Over3.5WLost 04
L#1 DoublesAndrea Fuentes / Kimberly Mitrenga vs Tami Murphy / Kortney Wassam1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMadison Noe vs Elena Gable3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Hanger / Lori Hunt vs Huong Doan / Laura Greene-Johnson3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJenika Hernandez / Susan Mayr vs Lorry Brown / Kim Vinton1-6, 1-6
2024-05-18vs MO/Pell/18&Over3.5WSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKelley Nosari / Leah Coleman vs Huong Doan / Debbie Pell6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesMadison Noe vs Tami Murphy1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAlisa Blasdel / Hayley Plumlee vs Kathy Drew / Donna Hoffmann7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCara Barber / Michelle Webb vs Lorry Brown / Kim Vinton6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-05-18vs MO/Pell/18&Over3.5WWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelley Nosari / Hayley Plumlee vs Lorry Brown / Kim Vinton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCara Barber / Alisa Blasdel vs Stephanie Wachob / Tami Murphy6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesLeah Coleman / Michelle Webb vs Huong Doan / Debbie Pell6-2, 6-3
2024-05-13vs MO/Pell/18&Over3.5WLost 14
W#1 DoublesKimberly Mitrenga / Shelly Jones vs Kim Vinton / Lorry Brown2-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJenika Hernandez vs Kortney Wassam0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Rollins / Lori Hunt vs Stephanie Wachob / Tami Murphy1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesMadison Noe vs Elena Gable0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea Fuentes / Susan Mayr vs Debbie Pell / Katherine Vandeven2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Alisa Blasdel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Hayley Plumlee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Leslie Echols
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.44
Cara Barber
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Andrea Fuentes
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Carolyn Hanger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.08
Carol Rollins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Kimberly Mitrenga
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Heather Maxey
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Jenika Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Kelley Nosari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Leah Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Hunt
published
Madison Noe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Shelly Jones
published
Susan Mayr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alisa Blasdel + Hayley Plumlee404 matchesnot enough data
Carol Rollins + Kimberly Mitrenga123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alisa Blasdel
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Hayley Plumlee
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Leslie Echols
98W–66L career · 2 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Cara Barber
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Andrea Fuentes
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Carolyn Hanger
20W–37L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Carol Rollins
37W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Kimberly Mitrenga
30W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Heather Maxey
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenika Hernandez
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kelley Nosari
11W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leah Coleman
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Hunt
25W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Madison Noe
2W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shelly Jones
13W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Mayr
18W–54L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.