Teams

OC FTC- Sanders

2021 USTA Adult 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2021-06-27vs OC 40 Love - Diekneit COISplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Mahoney Jones / Elizabeth Sanders vs Elizabeth Frost / Ann Lesser5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKathy Wilkinson / Yoko Ohigashi vs Julie Hull / Rosanne Oddo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2021-06-19vs OC RCI - AliWon 10
W#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Valentina Stepanova6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-13vs OC FVTC - SusieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLori Mahoney Jones / Elizabeth Sanders vs Jody Brennan / Stacy Tzur1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesYoko Ohigashi vs Hitomi Kawasaki6-2, 6-0
2021-06-06vs OC CMTC - DeeLost 02
L#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Rachel de Los Santos3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Justine Chen vs Mary Goff / Dee Harriman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-05-23vs OC LLW Irvine- MakLost 01
L#1 SinglesYoko Ohigashi vs Brittany Shieh5-7, 3-6
2021-05-08vs OC Humble Bees - DoanLost 02
L#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Trisha Rickard4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Justine Chen vs Thi Thu Huong Do / Naomi Sugiura4-6, 4-6
2021-04-24vs OC RCI - AliSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Sherry Morrison6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Justine Chen vs Sue Littman / Ali Razin6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-18vs OC FVTC - SusieWon 10
W#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Hitomi Kawasaki6-1, 6-2
2021-04-10vs OC CMTC - DeeLost 02
L#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Lorri Watson7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Sanders / Robin Briones vs Indrani Jackson / Mary Goff2-6, 1-6
2021-04-03vs OC LLW Irvine- MakLost 01
L#2 DoublesShelly Morgan / Robin Briones vs Julie Mak / Michele Savoie4-6, 4-6
2021-03-27vs OC Los Cab - ChingWon 10
W#1 SinglesYoko Ohigashi vs Cathy Sejansky6-3, 6-2
2021-03-21vs OC Humble Bees - DoanLost 02
L#1 SinglesLori Mahoney Jones vs Shannon Stolaruk5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Elizabeth Sanders vs Sally Scott / Trisha Rickard1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Shelly Morgan
published
3.68
Yoko Ohigashi
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 4
3.60
Lori Mahoney Jones
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 4
3.57
Robin Briones
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.56
Kim Byrens
published
3.14
Kathy Wilkinson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shelly Morgan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Yoko Ohigashi
82W–87L career · 8 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Lori Mahoney Jones
81W–124L career · 9 lines in 2021
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Robin Briones
111W–136L career · 6 lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
3.57
Kim Byrens
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kathy Wilkinson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.