Teams

Laurel Oak Cohler

2022 Sarasota Combo 18 & Over Summer Weekday · 6.5 W Thursday

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-15vs Sarasota/EspositoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaria Sutton / Stephanie Flatt vs Martina Kralickova / Christie Uihlein1-6, 1-6
2022-08-24vs Sarasota/EspositoSplit 11
L#2 DoublesStephanie Flatt / Leanne McWilliams vs Christie Uihlein / Margaret White3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesLori Bartkus / Caryn Carnevale vs Lisa Poythress / Krista Sprungman6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2022-07-28vs SSC RossSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKatie Pulvino / Leanne McWilliams vs Kim Bennaji / Mercy Ford4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLori Bartkus / Peggy Zimmerman vs Lisa Russo / Mona Harrington7-6, 6-2
2022-07-14vs LWN FitchetteLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Bartkus / Peggy Zimmerman vs Leila Romano / Marsha Baker4-6, 4-6
2022-06-30vs Payne Park BarcleyWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Flatt / Maria Sutton vs Kelly Reeve / Patty Avery6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLori Bartkus / Alicia Cohler vs Cecile Wooster / Melanie Barcley6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKatie Pulvino / Peggy Zimmerman vs Jo Anne Cullen / Heidi Funke4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 W Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caryn Carnevale
published 4
3.41
Sandra Poston
published
3.25
Leanne McWilliams
published
3.25
Alicia Cohler
published 3.5
3.22
Stephanie Flatt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Lori Bartkus
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Katie Pulvino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.73
Dawn Anton
published 3
Lesley France
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Bartkus + Stephanie Flatt8453% games+0.6% vs expected
Sandra Poston + Alicia Cohler1538% games−6.7% vs expected
Lori Bartkus + Katie Pulvino81144% games−9.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Caryn Carnevale
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Poston
48W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%24%
3.41
Leanne McWilliams
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Alicia Cohler
51W–59L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Stephanie Flatt
43W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Lori Bartkus
60W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Katie Pulvino
28W–36L career · 2 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Dawn Anton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Lesley France
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.