Teams

Hopkins/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-03-24vs Baird/White/NashvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesLarissa Rufener / Renee Atkins vs Maggie Vandever / Mandy Rogers2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLinda Staffen vs Jenna Gunnels6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesStephanie Skinner / Janine Hopkins vs Felicia Gannon / Brooke Parrish1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKris Seidenkranz / Trish Hughes vs Sarah Baird / Sarah White1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Traci Gilbert-Stafford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Kaelin Cramer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Megan de la O
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Kris Seidenkranz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Cindy Funck
published 3
2.72
Renee Atkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Theresa Hagan
published
2.58
Larissa Rufener
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Megan Michaels
published
2.52
Samantha Tramontin
published
2.49
Linda Staffen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.44
Janine Hopkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Jennifer Luteran
published
Kelly McCollum
published
Phaedra Yachimski
published
Trish Hughes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan de la O + Traci Gilbert-Stafford9850% games+0.4% vs expected
Kaelin Cramer + Traci Gilbert-Stafford6749% games+0.0% vs expected
Megan de la O + Kaelin Cramer3245% gamesnot enough data
Linda Staffen + Janine Hopkins033 matchesnot enough data
Renee Atkins + Kaelin Cramer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Traci Gilbert-Stafford
32W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Kaelin Cramer
30W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Megan de la O
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Kris Seidenkranz
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Cindy Funck
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Renee Atkins
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Theresa Hagan
1W–10L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Larissa Rufener
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
2.58
Megan Michaels
2W–16L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Samantha Tramontin
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Linda Staffen
5W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Janine Hopkins
2W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Jennifer Luteran
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.43
Kelly McCollum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Phaedra Yachimski
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Trish Hughes
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.