Teams

KY/LOU/CORBiIN/DALTON

2023 USTA TRI-LEVEL 40 & OVER ADULT · Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Terri Stone
published
3.61
Nancy Fetz
published
3.42
Tammy Pollock
published
3.23
Cathy Morris
published 3.5
3.20
Chris Hendrich
published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Heffley
published
3.12
Julie Dailey
published
3.08
Katherine Louis
published
3.04
Saadia Qureshi
published
3.02
Kimberly Polter
published
2.85
Allison Luckett
published 3
2.81
Cathy Wheeler
published 3
2.72
Daryl Alfrey
published 3
Jennifer Hicks
published
Vemihan Qaisi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Morris + Julie Dailey8550% games−7.3% vs expected
Cathy Wheeler + Chris Hendrich4251% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Polter + Katherine Louis123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terri Stone
26W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.76
Nancy Fetz
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.61
Tammy Pollock
41W–45L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Cathy Morris
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chris Hendrich
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Lisa Heffley
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Julie Dailey
17W–25L career · no lines in 2023
20%79%<1%
3.12
Katherine Louis
13W–24L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Saadia Qureshi
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Kimberly Polter
9W–19L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Allison Luckett
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Cathy Wheeler
11W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Daryl Alfrey
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
2.72
Jennifer Hicks
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Vemihan Qaisi
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.