Teams

40+ Jamie Lindsey

2026 Adult 40 & Over-EC · Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-19vs 40+ 4.0 Busby - Columbus - MTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJustin Waldrop / Brad Clayton vs Steve Swetz / Berk Huskison6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesShane Harrington / Harris Magruder vs Terry Nordquist / Bill Black7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2026-05-19vs 40+ 4.0 Busby - Columbus - MTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoger Huey / Harris Magruder vs Terry Nordquist / Bill Black4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesJustin Waldrop / Brad Clayton vs Michael Busby / Berk Huskison4-6, 5-7
2026-03-28vs 40+ 4.0 Busby - Columbus - MTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrian Quinn / Shane Harrington vs Michael Busby / Michael Pinson7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJamie Lindsey / Brent Waldrop vs Seong-Gon Kim / Doug Webber6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRoger Huey / Lewis Butler vs Steve Swetz / Phil McClellan7-6, 7-5
2026-03-28vs 40+ 4.0 Busby - Columbus - MTCSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRoger Huey / Shane Harrington vs Michael Busby / Seong-Gon Kim6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJamie Lindsey vs Steve Swetz3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRandy Talley / Lewis Butler vs Michael Pinson / S Carlton Gorton6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrent Waldrop / Brian Quinn vs Phil McClellan / Doug Webber6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
140+ Jamie Lindsey318816150
240+ 4.0 Busby - Columbus - MTC137919167

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Brian Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.79
Harris Magruder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Justin Waldrop
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Roger Huey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Brad Clayton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Jamie Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.41
Shane Harrington
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Brent Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Lewis Butler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Quinn
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Harris Magruder
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Justin Waldrop
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79
Roger Huey
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Brad Clayton
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
Jamie Lindsey
13W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45
Shane Harrington
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Brent Waldrop
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Lewis Butler
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.