Teams

BC-Seniorettes-Walker

2021 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.23 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-11-08vs BETC-KamplaineLost 12
L#1 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Vikki Littleman vs Joan Edwards / Sally Linebarger6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJane Thomas / Cynthia Anonsen vs Vivian Nagai / Sigrid Achtmann0-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSandra Rice / Esther Gladson vs Sylvian Colley / Diane Weiser6-1, 6-1
2020-10-31vs HBSQ-VitcovichLost 12
L#1 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Ann Lampman vs Vicki Clark / Carol Rea2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Sacks / Andrea Snyder vs Ann Hewitt / Traci Huffer1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMonika Jackson / Vikki Littleman vs Wanda Garfield / Nancy Burdyshaw6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2020-10-25vs EDG-The Fun Bus-Kainz 55Won 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Sacks / Andrea Snyder vs Michelle Kutz / Mona Forster6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Rice / Ingrid Sarapuu vs Melissa Beckman / Terry Yuan7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Lampman / Monika Jackson vs Cynthia Shimizu / Sharon Kay6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2020-10-18vs RBW-WilliamsWon 21
L#1 DoublesJane Thomas / Beth Smith vs Dawn Williams / Marie MacKey0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesVikki Littleman / Ingrid Sarapuu vs Brigitte Marbaix / Maren Gibson4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCynthia Anonsen / Monika Jackson vs Nancy Becherer / Jaye Siqueiros6-3, 6-4
2020-10-10vs WSC-Sheldon-SmithLost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Snyder / Susan Sacks vs Betty Hummer / Susan Thim4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Vikki Littleman vs Tammi Walker / Deanne Angell3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBeth Smith / Jane Thomas vs Marla Vasilatos / Chris Gonzales6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2020-09-26vs Lower Woodland-Team Thing-StoneLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrea Snyder / Cynthia Anonsen vs Kathy McCann / Karen Stern4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Rice / Ingrid Sarapuu vs Sue Matyas / Julia Pollock7-6, 3-5
L#3 DoublesSusan Walker / Susan Sacks vs Kathryn Sullivan / Robin Trucksess1-6, 2-6
2020-09-20vs AYTC (OUTDOORS) Edwards 7.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMonika Jackson / Cynthia Anonsen vs Michelle Osborn / Karalyn Kedroske0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Ann Lampman vs Anna Karlin / Michelle Hill1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSusan Walker / Jane Thomas vs Ge Li / May-Jun Chao6-4, 4-4
2020-09-12vs CAC/SL-KingWon 30
W#1 DoublesAndrea Snyder / Susan Sacks vs Meg Butler / Teresa King7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesIngrid Sarapuu / Ann Lampman vs Gail Case / Michelle Michael6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSandra Rice / Beth Smith vs Kim Foley / Sandy Rauen6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 7.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Lower Woodland-Team Thing-Stone802228149
2HBSQ-Vitcovich6215920189
3AYTC (OUTDOORS) Edwards 7.062141022212
4BETC-Hollar4312918179
5CP-Team Kaboom-Czerwinski43101126202
6BETC-Kamplaine44101428220
7EDG-The Fun Bus-Kainz 5544111330203
8BC-Vintage-Anderson3481331207
9BC-Seniorettes-Walker35111329236
10WSC-Sheldon-Smith35101432228
11TCSP-Nevertheless...Ellison2581328207
12RBW-Williams26111328191
13Lower Woodland-Hart0741736235
14CAC/SL-King0842042272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Susan Sacks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Andrea Snyder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Cynthia Anonsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Ingrid Sarapuu
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Beth Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
Cindy Coakley
published 3
2.80
Sandra Rice
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Esther Gladson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Susan Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Ann Lampman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.56
Vikki Littleman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Carol Whitaker
published 0
Jane Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Monika Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Sandy Sterken
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Coakley + Sandra Rice3252% games+0.2% vs expected
Cindy Coakley + Carol Whitaker5552% games−0.5% vs expected
Susan Sacks + Ingrid Sarapuu6258% games−2.5% vs expected
Cindy Coakley + Vikki Littleman3343% games−2.5% vs expected
Cynthia Anonsen + Andrea Snyder2547% games−2.7% vs expected
Beth Smith + Sandra Rice31139% games−4.6% vs expected
Vikki Littleman + Ann Lampman3645% games−5.5% vs expected
Vikki Littleman + Sandra Rice1832% games−6.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susan Sacks
116W–68L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Andrea Snyder
44W–46L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Cynthia Anonsen
20W–27L career · type S · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ingrid Sarapuu
75W–74L career · 8 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Beth Smith
26W–46L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Cindy Coakley
40W–73L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Sandra Rice
32W–63L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Esther Gladson
27W–42L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
3
Susan Walker
12W–23L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
3
Ann Lampman
39W–85L career · 4 lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.67
3
Vikki Littleman
22W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
2.56
0
Carol Whitaker
15W–31L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Jane Thomas
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Monika Jackson
7W–11L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Sterken
1W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.