Teams

Dickerson

2024 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Combined

8 players · average NTRP / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesJudy Sindecuse / Scott Sindecuse vs John Callahan / Susan Fisher4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Dickerson / Julie Jackman vs Annette Harris / Jon Tchen6-3, 6-3
2024-09-19vs HendelLost 01
L#1 DoublesRichard Dickerson / Julie Jackman vs Shirine Faris / Jim Enright2-6, 1-6
2024-09-05vs STL/Shouldis/55&Over8.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Sindecuse / Trina Ngo vs Anne Muren / Sam Shouldis4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJerry Stanley / Julie Jackman vs Patricia Fry / Lyndon Morgan6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRichard Dickerson / Judy Sindecuse vs Amy Siebenman / Joseph Delsignore1-6, 3-6
2024-08-22vs SCOFLO (Streeter/Stinson)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Nash / Elizabeth Spencer vs Scott Stinson / Florence Streeter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJerry Stanley / Julie Jackman vs Donna Geiselhart / Gabriel Vuagniaux6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesRichard Dickerson / Trina Ngo vs Art Staden / Jane Hamm0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-08-15vs HendelWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrina Ngo / Scott Sindecuse vs Liz Rice / David Hagenbrock6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJohn Nash / Elizabeth Spencer vs Leanne Cantu / Jim Enright6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJerry Stanley / Julie Jackman vs Ellen Hendel / Timothy Buerk6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 8.0 Combined
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Shouldis/55&Over8.0MXD6014411118
2SCOFLO (Streeter/Stinson)3381021159
3Dickerson238716135
4Wheeland and Dealin (Shouldis/Wheeland)2351021151
5Hendel1571122157

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Jerry Stanley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.78
Elizabeth Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.56
Julie Jackman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.52
Judy Sindecuse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.29
Richard Dickerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
John Nash
published
Scott Sindecuse
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Trina Ngo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Sindecuse + Trina Ngo123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Jackman + Jerry Stanley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jerry Stanley
42W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.86
Elizabeth Spencer
149W–79L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Julie Jackman
60W–73L career · 5 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Judy Sindecuse
72W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.52
Richard Dickerson
27W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
3.29
John Nash
68W–22L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Scott Sindecuse
75W–35L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Trina Ngo
17W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.