Teams

Grand Slam: Spindoctors

2024 18&Over Women Day Fall · 4.5 Day

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-12-08vs TIA: DREAM TEAMWon 21
L#1 DoublesHope Foley / Julie Anderson vs Sarah Thompson / Heather Rich2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesGillian Scott / Camilla Keighery vs Marcela Castro / Allison Axenrod7-6, 3-4
W#3 DoublesPaola Murphy / Leah Butler vs Laura Treanor Coury / Carole Allers3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-12-01vs NRRC: Honey DeucesWon 21
L#1 DoublesEmilie Chang / KATIE SCHMITZ vs Jani Mason / Christine Levine1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Anderson / Camilla Keighery vs Kristen Bevilacqua / Loren Dinger6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnne Teillon / Whitney Maurer vs Courtney Blatt / Leah McVey6-4, 6-3
2023-11-20vs Armonk Indoor: Street KnowledgeWon 21
L#1 DoublesRegi Monroe / Michelle Kanter vs Heather Rice / Ally Shaule4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKATIE SCHMITZ / Camilla Keighery vs Andrea Jemiolo / Candace Jemiolo6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesVictoria Williams / Hope Foley vs Meghan Martucci / Lauren Lazar7-6, 6-0
2023-11-03vs TIA: CCLLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Kanter / Paola Murphy vs Tara Blanchard / Yvonne D'aquino6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesStefanie Chachra / Katherine Sun vs Diane Luftig / Jelena Spyropoulos6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Landry Le / Anne Teillon vs Cristina Casati-Lewis / Jessica Ulrich2-6, 6-7
2023-10-20vs TIA: DREAM TEAMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKATIE SCHMITZ / Gabrielle Collins vs Jiyon Lee / Melissa Shaw3-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesEmilie Chang / Paola Murphy vs Keiko Hamasu / Naomi Proctor4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesWhitney Maurer / Kelly Thomas vs Heike Martens / Natasha Sauerborn4-6, 1-6
2023-10-13vs NRRC: Honey DeucesWon 30
W#1 DoublesGabrielle Collins / Maryann Cantone vs Elizabeth Smoltz / Loren Dinger6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCamilla Keighery / Carolyn Uhlein vs Courtney Blatt / Leah McVey6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKATIE SCHMITZ / Julie Anderson vs Linda Lee / Sylvie Roisin6-4, 7-6
2023-09-29vs TIA: CCLWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmilie Chang / KATIE SCHMITZ vs Theresa Oconnor / Michele Shepard3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeah Butler / Jennifer Landry Le vs Cinta Delmonaco-Kemp / Yvonne D'aquino0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAnne Teillon / Jorrie Bruffett vs Amy Guttman / Becky Bellino7-6, 4-5
2023-09-22vs Armonk Indoor: Street KnowledgeLost 12
L#1 DoublesRegi Monroe / Carolyn Uhlein vs Jessica Niebauer Teves / Ally Shaule3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGabrielle Collins / Katherine Sun vs Meghan Martucci / Elina Kapostina3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCamilla Keighery / Gillian Scott vs Shobana Musti / Kathleen Reuter7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TIA: CCL0813920215
2TIA: DREAM TEAM08131020211
3Armonk Indoor: Street Knowledge08131124216
4Grand Slam: Spindoctors08121127222
5NRRC: Honey Deuces0871737252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.13 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.45
Paola Murphy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.44
KATIE SCHMITZ
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.36
Regi Monroe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.24
Michelle Kanter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.21
Hope Foley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.18
Whitney Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.15
Gabrielle Collins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.15
Victoria Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Katherine Sun
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.12
Kelly Thomas
published
4.08
Jennifer Landry Le
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Camilla Keighery
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.98
Emilie Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.94
Jorrie Bruffett
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.93
Maryann Cantone
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.92
Anne Teillon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Gillian Scott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Carolyn Uhlein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stefanie Chachra
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KATIE SCHMITZ + Camilla Keighery4260% games+10.3% vs expected
Camilla Keighery + Gillian Scott491462% games+7.0% vs expected
Julie Anderson + Camilla Keighery6250% games+5.3% vs expected
Katherine Sun + Jorrie Bruffett3251% games+5.0% vs expected
Hope Foley + Victoria Williams8256% games+4.9% vs expected
Hope Foley + Katherine Sun3253% games+3.0% vs expected
Gabrielle Collins + Julie Anderson412056% games+2.5% vs expected
Anne Teillon + Victoria Williams211156% games+2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Paola Murphy
68W–38L career · 3 lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
4.45
KATIE SCHMITZ
154W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
4.44
Regi Monroe
69W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
4.36
Michelle Kanter
46W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Hope Foley
70W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
5%93%1%
4.21
Whitney Maurer
54W–30L career · 7 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Gabrielle Collins
113W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Victoria Williams
58W–39L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Katherine Sun
34W–39L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
Kelly Thomas
31W–26L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.12
Jennifer Landry Le
55W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Camilla Keighery
131W–51L career · 7 lines in 2024
32%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Emilie Chang
232W–144L career · 3 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jorrie Bruffett
165W–95L career · 2 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.94
Maryann Cantone
201W–136L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4.5
Anne Teillon
118W–82L career · 5 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.92
4.5
Gillian Scott
91W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.85
Carolyn Uhlein
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Anderson
102W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefanie Chachra
10W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.