Teams

Huckelbury/Garretson/FS/CM

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring 1 · 9.0 Men - Local League at State

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-17vs AR 9.0M 55 & Over (Bradshaw)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJames Owens / Mark Dutton vs Wyatt Miller / Gary Jones0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesShawn Adair / Bob Lucky vs John Stanley Bailey / Joseph Murphy3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEric Mathis / Rick Byrd vs Greg Fess / Kirk Bradshaw1-6, 2-6
2026-05-17vs AR 9.0M 55 & Over (Bradshaw)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Huckelbury / Garth Krizman vs Donnie Wallis / Bynum Matthews4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKyle Garretson / James Owens vs Jay Heflin / Britt Loyd6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBob Lucky / Shawn Adair vs Otto Fry / Eric Sixbey4-6, 5-7
2026-05-16vs AR 9.0M 55 & Over (Bradshaw)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKyle Garretson / Rick Byrd vs Gary Jones / Donnie Wallis2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGarth Krizman / Eric Mathis vs Joseph Murphy / John Stanley Bailey2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Owens / Mark Dutton vs Bynum Matthews / Kirk Bradshaw1-6, 5-7
2026-05-16vs AR 9.0M 55 & Over (Bradshaw)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRobert Huckelbury / Shawn Adair vs Wyatt Miller / Greg Fess0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBob Lucky / Eric Mathis vs Britt Loyd / Jay Heflin5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Garretson / Rick Byrd vs Eric Sixbey / Otto Fry3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0 Men - Local League at State
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AR 9.0M 55 & Over (Bradshaw)40111370
2Huckelbury/Garretson/FS/CM0411123141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Bob Lucky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Shawn Adair
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.86
Robert Huckelbury
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Garth Krizman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kyle Garretson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Mark Dutton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Rick Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Huckelbury + Shawn Adair2933% gamesnot enough data
Rick Byrd + Kyle Garretson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bob Lucky
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Shawn Adair
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
Robert Huckelbury
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
3.86
Garth Krizman
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kyle Garretson
5W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Dutton
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rick Byrd
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.