Teams

Beerman Smart Aces - N. Giusto

Polk Casual League · Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall

11 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Aroma Taicher / Allison Sorenson6-2, 7-5
2022-11-02Won 10
W#4 DoublesCynthia Hallock / Kim Martin vs Sandra Alford / Marcia Whitney3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-10-26Lost 01
L#5 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Lisa Moseley / Jaimi Miller7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-10-19Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCynthia Hallock / Kim Martin vs Jan Borden / Anna Previte5-7, 3-4
2022-10-12Won 10
W#4 DoublesAngie Shoemaker / Cynthia Hallock vs Grace Greyson / Giovanna Favilli4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-09-21Won 10
W#4 DoublesCynthia Hallock / Kim Martin vs Eva Mora / Regina Espitia6-4, 7-5
2022-09-14Won 10
W#4 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Jennifer Payne / Sandra Alford6-1, 6-2
2022-09-07vs LCC - S. DryerWon 10
W#4 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Susan Dreyer / Jaimi Miller6-4, 6-2
2022-08-31vs Lakeland City Slicers - M. DarchWon 10
W#5 DoublesKim Martin / Cynthia Hallock vs Elizabeth Provenzano / Kelly Abad6-3, 6-4
2022-08-24Won 10
W#4 DoublesAngie Shoemaker / Cynthia Hallock vs Svetlana Darrow / Frances Hall6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Polk Ladies Casual Play Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cassie Miller
published 4
3.88
Meriel' Peterich
published
3.88
Amanda Strawbridge
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 23% · published 4
3.75
Kacee Swain
published
3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
3.54
Jennifer Spann
published
3.42
Angie Shoemaker
published 3.5
3.22
Cynthia Hallock
usually #4 Doubles 60%, also #5 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #5 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Gloria Murphy
published 3.5
3.02
Desiree Tchipanova
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Hallock + Nathaly Arredondo3351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Miller
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Meriel' Peterich
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Amanda Strawbridge
114W–40L career · 22 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
Kacee Swain
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Spann
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Angie Shoemaker
11W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Cynthia Hallock
65W–38L career · 10 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 11 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Gloria Murphy
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Desiree Tchipanova
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.