Teams

RCH MCMURRAY

2024 Adult 18&Over-PB · Men 3.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-04-23vs Sumrall 3.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Patrick / Lee Southwell vs Jon Goldman / William Morris6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJavier Barquero / Andrew Rhodes vs James Sumrall / Sourav Dutta7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2024-04-02vs Sumrall 3.5Lost 04
L#1 DoublesAdam Patrick / Eric Rodgers vs Jamie Massengale / Andy Woodard0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJavier Barquero vs Wesley Bailey3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDab McMurray / Chase Barnes vs Jon Goldman / William Norris6-4, 4-5
L#2 SinglesDouglas Branam vs Sourav Dutta1-6, 3-6
2024-02-27vs Sumrall 3.5Lost 05
L#1 DoublesJacob Shemper / Dab McMurray vs Jon Goldman / Wilson Bounds3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDouglas Branam vs Wesley Bailey3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJavier Barquero / Chase Barnes vs Bruce Case / Jamie Massengale4-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesLee Southwell vs Chad Carmichael2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrew Rhodes / Eric Rodgers vs Sourav Dutta / Alfonso Preziosi2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RCH MCMURRAY0201020120
2Roseberry 3.50461429212

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Andrew Rhodes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.36
Douglas Branam
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Adam Patrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Dab McMurray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Eric Rodgers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Jacob Shemper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Javier Barquero
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lee Southwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dab McMurray + Eric Rodgers213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Rhodes
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Douglas Branam
16W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Adam Patrick
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Dab McMurray
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Eric Rodgers
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Jacob Shemper
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Alejandro Barquero
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Javier Barquero
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Southwell
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.