Teams

AATL 5.0W 18 & Over (Ferguson)

18 & Over · 5.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-13vs UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolina Blouin / Marlene Telesford Gardham vs Brittney Desmond / Zoe Campbell7-5, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrennan Ferguson / Jeannette Hammers vs Amanda Sherman / Emma Pixley2-6, 4-6
2026-06-13vs SC 5.0W 18 & Over (Walter)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrennan Ferguson / Jeannette Hammers vs Madison Cook / Renee Leacock2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Howard / Andrea Mercer vs Alexandra Dawson / Meghan Polk1-6, 0-6
2026-06-12vs UPTA (A) 5.0W 18 & Over (Sherman)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJeannette Hammers / Andrea Mercer vs Brittney Desmond / Zoe Campbell5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrennan Ferguson / Kerry Howard vs Amanda Sherman / Jessica Vest1-6, 2-6
2026-06-12vs SC 5.0W 18 & Over (Walter)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJeannette Hammers / Andrea Mercer vs Meghan Polk / Renee Leacock2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBrennan Ferguson vs Alexandra Dawson0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKerry Howard / Marlene Telesford Gardham vs Caroline Holland / Melissa Thieke1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.04 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Jeannette Hammers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.19
Marlene Telesford Gardham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.10
Andrea Mercer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.98
Brennan Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Kristin Risher
published
3.85
Julia Fulbright
published
3.79
Kerry Howard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brennan Ferguson + Jeannette Hammers134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeannette Hammers
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
Marlene Telesford Gardham
11W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Andrea Mercer
4W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Brennan Ferguson
13W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.98
Kristin Risher
2W–10L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
3.94
Julia Fulbright
18W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.85
Kerry Howard
15W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.