Teams

Swisher/LHCC/Foothills

2022 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 7.5 Combo Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.85 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-19vs Artus/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesJim Heisler / Hank Eimer vs Philip Artus / Gennard Lombardozzi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-10-18vs FDSP-Sprague-DVACWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Shepler / CJ Hines vs David Sprague / Greg Diamonti6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAaron Swisher / Mark Huegerich vs Mark Ginn / Donald Rex6-0, 6-1
2022-10-05vs Sigmon/HCP/FoothillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAaron Swisher / Mark Huegerich vs Aaron Steen / Mark Eckard6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDaniel Shepler / Lawrence Thompson vs Jody Eckard / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr6-2, 6-2
2022-09-28vs Artus/DV/FoothillsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJim Heisler / Hank Eimer vs Jesse Miller / Phillip Bruch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDaniel Shepler / Allen Finley vs Jason Triplett / Ryan Postlethwait5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-21vs FDSP-Sprague-DVACSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAaron Swisher / Allen Finley vs Chris Eller / Michael Brewer6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJim Heisler / Mark Huegerich vs David Sprague / Greg Diamonti7-6, 6-7
2022-08-31vs FDSP-Sprague-DVACWon 10
W#1 DoublesAaron Swisher / Lawrence Thompson vs Mark Ginn / Donald Rex6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Jim Heisler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.90
Aaron Swisher
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.83
3.82
Daniel Shepler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
George Bolter
published 4
3.77
Dustin Deal
published 4
3.75
Chad East
published 4
3.68
Mark Huegerich
published
3.47
Lawrence Thompson
published
3.34
Hank Eimer
published 3.5
3.27
Allen Finley
published 3.5
3.20
CJ Hines
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jim Heisler + Aaron Swisher7258% games+10.1% vs expected
Jim Heisler + Everett Wohlbruck4351% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jim Heisler
103W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.94
4
Aaron Swisher
170W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Everett Wohlbruck
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Daniel Shepler
54W–27L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
George Bolter
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Dustin Deal
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Chad East
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Mark Huegerich
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Lawrence Thompson
22W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Hank Eimer
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Allen Finley
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
CJ Hines
6W–4L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.