Teams

C7 Willow Oaks Matawaran

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-05-15vs C3 Woodlake PhelpsWon 10
W#2 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Adelaide Urban6-1, 6-2
2021-05-08vs C1 Salisbury JamWon 10
W#2 SinglesDarlene Moehling vs Heather Joyce6-2, 6-3
2021-04-17vs C2 Dominion SpillareWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnne-Marie Anderson / Darlene Moehling vs Kristen Iurillo / Sandra Crawford6-2, 6-4
2021-04-03vs C3 Woodlake PhelpsLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarlene Moehling / Colette Christianson vs Laura Brawley / Julia Morrison6-2, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Darlene Moehling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.43
Morgan Hutter
published
3.38
Heather Drew
published 3.5
3.37
Cheri Stringer
published 3.5
3.37
Laura Vetter
published
3.10
Anne-Marie Anderson
published 3.5
3.07
Zinie Sampson
published
3.04
Sule Sauvigne
published
2.88
Kelly Beazley
published
2.82
Stacy Curtis
published
2.82
Anne Scher
published 3
2.81
Kristin Hamlin
published
2.75
2.66
Beth Kelly
published 3
2.63
2.57
Katie Bressler
published
Nikki Powell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Vetter + Heather Drew2356% games+0.1% vs expected
Stacy Curtis + Catherine Matawaran3343% games−10.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darlene Moehling
113W–77L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.88
Morgan Hutter
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Heather Drew
13W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Cheri Stringer
9W–6L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
Laura Vetter
20W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Anne-Marie Anderson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
Zinie Sampson
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%29%71%
3.07
Sule Sauvigne
10W–14L career · no lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kelly Beazley
10W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
Stacy Curtis
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Anne Scher
17W–17L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
Kristin Hamlin
17W–20L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Catherine Matawaran
16W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Beth Kelly
4W–9L career · no lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
2.66
3
Colette Christianson
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
2.63
Katie Bressler
9W–13L career · no lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
2.57
Nikki Powell
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.