Teams

GA Club Tolbert

2025 COTA USTA Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women - Spring · 3.0 weekday women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-21vs Traditions of Braselton-SmithLost 23
L#1 DoublesIrene Kummerer / Deborah Brown vs Lynn Yearous / Shawnda Smith2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Wiedower vs Kristen Hill3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathryn Arent / Catherine Tillman vs Dana Halpin / Carol Eakins6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMaureen Lawson / Jennifer Kennedy vs Anita Stephens / Sandy Carroll7-5, 2-6, 6-4
W#4 DoublesAmy Smith / Gail Ford vs Sharon Sambuco / Lane Allen6-1, 6-4
2025-03-07vs ATC/Fowler Elm 3.0 Spring 40Lost 23
L#1 DoublesDeborah Brown / Bonnie Howard vs Lee Bradway / Donyalle Thomas3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Wiedower vs Robin Elm2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Jackson / Catherine Tillman vs Kathryn Postiglione / Tracy Galphin6-1, 2-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesGina Rittenger / Donna Dickerson vs Lori Daniluk / Kelli Fowler7-5, 6-7, 3-6
W#4 DoublesKathy Coots / Tasha Harris vs Jennifer Vaughan / Kate Carlson6-4, 4-6, 6-4
2025-02-21vs JMCC/BachSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKathryn Arent / Irene Kummerer vs Linda Bach / Kiva Schindler7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesBeth Moneyhan vs Jenny Brown4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDonna Dickerson / Kelly Wiedower vs Pat Watson / Deborah Kincaid6-3, 6-2
L#4 DoublesGail Ford / Tasha Harris vs Kate Patterson / Natalie Thompson3-6, 4-6
2025-02-14vs Traditions of Braselton-SmithLost 12
W#2 DoublesBonnie Howard / Donna Dickerson vs Tammy Rodriguez / Carol Eakins6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Kennedy / Kathryn Arent vs Amy Chan / Dana Halpin6-7, 6-4, 5-7
L#4 DoublesJessica Gibson / Gail Ford vs Sharon Sambuco / Nancy Burke2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-02-07vs OVP/Payne/CroweWon 41
W#1 DoublesIrene Kummerer / Bonnie Howard vs Jasna Cope / Margaret Meyran6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKelly Wiedower vs Carrie Gray6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Jackson / Maureen Lawson vs Michele Adams / Rebekah Paschal6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDonna Dickerson / Gina Rittenger vs Barbara Payne / Thayer Tucker6-2, 2-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesCatherine Tillman / Jennifer Kennedy vs Janet Manning / Carol Meredith6-3, 6-2
2025-01-24vs ATC/Fowler Elm 3.0 Spring 40Lost 13
L#1 DoublesBonnie Howard / Irene Kummerer vs Lee Bradway / Donyalle Thomas2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesBeth Moneyhan vs Lori Daniluk2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCatherine Tillman / Kathryn Arent vs Kathryn Postiglione / Cari Borisuk7-6, 6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Kennedy / Gail Ford vs Jennifer Vaughan / Kathleen Bienkowski6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 weekday women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Irene Kummerer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Tasha Harris
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Bonnie Howard
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Becky Tolbert
published 3
2.76
Maureen Lawson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Beth Moneyhan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.70
Donna Dickerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.69
Kathryn Arent
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.65
Kathy Coots
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Gina Rittenger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.59
Catherine Tillman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.57
Gail Ford
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kelly Wiedower
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Tillman + Kathryn Arent4353% games+9.9% vs expected
Gina Rittenger + Donna Dickerson2349% games−3.0% vs expected
Irene Kummerer + Bonnie Howard1443% gamesnot enough data
Gina Rittenger + Tasha Harris224 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Tillman + Becky Tolbert303 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Lawson + Donna Dickerson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Irene Kummerer
24W–31L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
Tasha Harris
16W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Bonnie Howard
36W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Becky Tolbert
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Maureen Lawson
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Beth Moneyhan
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
Donna Dickerson
11W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.70
Kathryn Arent
9W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Kathy Coots
9W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Gina Rittenger
7W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.60
3
Catherine Tillman
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Gail Ford
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Kelly Wiedower
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.