Teams

Racquet Club 1

2023 WINTER A18&O WEEKEND · 2023 Winter A18&O 2.5 WOMEN Career

17 players · average NTRP 2.90 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2023 Winter A18&O 2.5 WOMEN Career have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Jessie Rinker
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.13
Jenna Renshaw
published
2.77
Marisa Nye
published
Amy Matlock
published 3
Izzy Bowles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Cory Kooperman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Laura Beach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.50
Karlye Martin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Heather Harcourt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.41
Anne Finley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.39
Paige Rogers
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.38
Sarah Sleboda
published
2.18
Sally Wolfe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jennifer Berg
published
Lori Hall
published
Regan Reilly
published
Renee DiDonato
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Harcourt + Jessie Rinker2357% games+15.0% vs expected
Sally Wolfe + Amy Matlock1442% games+1.2% vs expected
Karlye Martin + Paige Rogers1933% games−3.2% vs expected
Karlye Martin + Marisa Nye4449% gamesnot enough data
Anne Finley + Cory Kooperman5160% gamesnot enough data
Paige Rogers + Amy Matlock2345% gamesnot enough data
Sally Wolfe + Jessie Rinker3246% gamesnot enough data
Marisa Nye + Sally Wolfe134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Rinker
85W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%9%91%
3.17
Jenna Renshaw
54W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.13
Marisa Nye
102W–87L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Amy Matlock
19W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Izzy Bowles
13W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Cory Kooperman
51W–32L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
Laura Beach
43W–63L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Karlye Martin
47W–61L career · 2 lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Heather Harcourt
26W–35L career · 5 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Anne Finley
81W–125L career · 4 lines in 2023
0%77%23%
2.41
Paige Rogers
42W–93L career · 5 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.39
Sarah Sleboda
13W–21L career · no lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.38
Sally Wolfe
33W–63L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Jennifer Berg
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lori Hall
7W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regan Reilly
5W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Renee DiDonato
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.