Teams

ETindel (Charlotte CC)

2025-2026 Winter Doubles Charlotte USTA FLEX League · 3.0 Women Doubles; Daytime

4 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-01-07vs CMcLester/Beebe/Hussey (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Tindel / Jordan Collier vs Lisa Beebe / Catherine Mclester6-2, 6-2
2026-01-05vs ACombs (BCC); Slicing MavensWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Tindel / Stacy Beard vs Rebecca Maietta / Kristen Palmer6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2025-12-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStacy Beard / Emily Tindel vs Katie Nelson / Lauren Pelletier2-6, 2-6
2025-11-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Tindel / Stacy Beard vs Liz Bertrand / Diane Smith3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Doubles; Daytime have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Jordan Collier
published
2.85
2.69
Emily Tindel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.49
Stacy Beard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine Ruth Kelly + Emily Tindel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jordan Collier
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3
Catherine Ruth Kelly
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Emily Tindel
32W–64L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%89%1%
2.69
Stacy Beard
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.