Teams

Upper Dublin

Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-15vs RacketeersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDave Mitchell / Joe Venneri vs Ed Daou / Luis Lamoratta6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesManuel Carbajo / Christopher Bradley vs David Spain / Scott Smith6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesArland Hotchkiss / Patrick Egan vs Evan Davis / Joe Mullen3-6, 2-6
2026-08-08vs Expendables 8Lost 12
W#1 DoublesDave Mitchell / Joe Venneri vs Carlos Araujo / Sal Giordano6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesManuel Carbajo / Christopher Bradley vs Joseph Busby / Thomas Buker6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAlbert LaBrusciano / Michael Silverman vs David Miller / Donald Jung2-6, 2-6
2026-08-01vs PO PalsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bradley / Manuel Carbajo vs Michael Boldin / Philip Jiang6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesPatrick Egan / Michael Silverman vs Ananthakrishnan Krishnan / Deping Chai6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Brown / Marcos DeArruda vs Nick He / Jun Tao2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-07-25vs CAUSING A RACQUETWon 30
W#1 DoublesDave Mitchell / Joe Venneri vs Theodore Moore / James Greene6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesManuel Carbajo / Christopher Bradley vs John Pagano / Veerendra Shandilya6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMarcos DeArruda / Peter Lee vs Michael Meistering / Robert Fox6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-07-18vs RacketeersLost 12
L#1 DoublesCraig Kamen / Albert LaBrusciano vs Carlos Guzman / Luis Lamoratta6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesManuel Carbajo / Christopher Bradley vs Evan Davis / James Taylor6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesArland Hotchkiss / Joe Venneri vs Joe Mullen / Scott Smith6-4, 7-6
2026-07-11vs DTC Men's 55+ 7.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bradley / Manuel Carbajo vs Bradley Carlson / Chris Manion6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDave Mitchell / Keith Rist vs Craig Batten / Kevin Kleemeier5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Expendables 8Won 21
L#1 DoublesDonald Archer / Joe Venneri vs John Bower / Martin Ramos2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesManuel Carbajo / Christopher Bradley vs Andrew Olson / Donald Jung6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesHal Perlman / Peter Lee vs David Miller / James Aversano6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Donald Archer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Manuel Carbajo
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.46
Dave Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Joe Venneri
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Craig Kamen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Keith Rist
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Christopher Bradley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.04
Arland Hotchkiss
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Julio Martin-Garcia
published
2.99
Albert LaBrusciano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.67
Marcos DeArruda
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Hal Perlman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Silverman
published
Patrick Egan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Keith Rist + Dave Mitchell3259% games+5.0% vs expected
Albert LaBrusciano + Craig Kamen81544% games−2.6% vs expected
Manuel Carbajo + Christopher Bradley5268% gamesnot enough data
Joe Venneri + Manuel Carbajo213 matchesnot enough data
Joe Venneri + Dave Mitchell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donald Archer
27W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Manuel Carbajo
32W–19L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Dave Mitchell
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
Joe Venneri
41W–21L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Craig Kamen
27W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Keith Rist
12W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Christopher Bradley
5W–2L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
3.5
Arland Hotchkiss
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.04
Julio Martin-Garcia
22W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3.5
Albert LaBrusciano
23W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.99
Marcos DeArruda
6W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Hal Perlman
59W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Silverman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Patrick Egan
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Peter Lee
23W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.