Teams

Spears 5.5 Combo W 2026

2026 Decatur Southern Combo 18 and Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.67 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 5.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Spears 5.5 Combo W 2026000000
2Bair 5.5 Combo W000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Lisa Pant
published
2.81
2.64
Kimberly Matson
published
2.60
Cassandra Smith
published 3
2.44
Shelley Hopkins
published
2.34
Debbie Bailie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.32
Kathy Parnell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.30
Erika Huber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Cathleen Rupp
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Cassidy McClellan
published 2.5
2.03
Belinda Rossi
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erika Huber + Kimberly Matson134 matchesnot enough data
Erika Huber + Belinda Rossi033 matchesnot enough data
Debbie Bailie + Belinda Rossi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Pant
40W–39L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Anna Smith Walton
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
Kimberly Matson
43W–73L career · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
3
Cassandra Smith
26W–31L career · no lines in 2026
23%76%<1%
2.60
Shelley Hopkins
24W–14L career · no lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
2.5
Debbie Bailie
35W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
Kathy Parnell
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Erika Huber
22W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Cathleen Rupp
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Cassidy McClellan
3W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Belinda Rossi
10W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.