Teams

Collier - Naples Grande - L. Lavery

2021 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-03-01vs Island Country Club - J. MalyWon 10
W#1 DoublesDebra Logue / Nancy Harbert vs Mary Nugent / Karen Crines6-2, 6-3
2021-02-22vs Pelican Bay Park - N. BlackSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPeggy Hogan / Nancy Harbert vs Biqin Teng / JANE BRUDERS6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Diette / Debra Logue vs Mary Villani / Mary Taylor7-6, 6-2
2021-02-15vs Naples Beach Club - EddyWon 10
W#2 DoublesBernadette Devoe / Nancy Harbert vs Suzy Rodmell / Jessica Louchheim6-0, 6-2
2021-02-08vs Shadow Wood CC - K. LawleySplit 11
W#2 DoublesDebra Logue / Susan Diette vs Kim Huttenlocher / Lisa Korby6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Tambellini / Margaret Werchek vs Alison Pollitt / Elizabeth Lucke2-6, 4-6
2021-01-25vs Island Country Club - J. MalyWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Harbert / Debra Logue vs Keely Miller / Ann Pfister-Brown6-1, 6-3
2021-01-18vs Pelican Bay Park - N. BlackWon 20
W#1 DoublesPeggy Hogan / Nancy Harbert vs Joanne Blum / JANE BRUDERS6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTrish Erickson / Debra Logue vs Hildy Glick / Kathie Karp6-4, 6-3
2021-01-11vs Naples Beach Club - EddyWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeidi Stock / Debra Logue vs Patricia Ringler / Mary Wright6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKaren Tambellini / Margaret Werchek vs Susan Magno / Lindsay Simmons7-5, 6-2
2021-01-04Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Harbert / Peggy Hogan vs Beth Smith / Priscilla Harrington6-0, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Debra Logue
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Barbara Dovin
published 4
3.55
3.32
Lorrie Lavery
published
3.28
Bernadette Devoe
published 3.5
Margaret Werchek
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nancy Harbert
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Peggy Hogan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Harbert + Debra Logue6353% gamesnot enough data
Margaret Werchek + Debra Logue4254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Debra Logue
162W–90L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Anne Marie Russell
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Barbara Dovin
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Jacqueline Spinelli
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
Lorrie Lavery
3W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Bernadette Devoe
4W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.28
Margaret Werchek
55W–48L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nancy Harbert
148W–83L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Peggy Hogan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.