Teams

Doyle/18s/3.0/PAC Night

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Adult 18 & Over - Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Brooke Brown
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Ann Boushie
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3
3.03
Molly Burns
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Laura Bonanno
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Amy St. Romain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.80
Emily Cristina
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Elizabeth Guidotti
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published
Emily Sorrel
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jessica Haley
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published
Joelle Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Kathie Daigle
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 41% · published
Kim Kocken
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Lindsey Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Nela Otero
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published
Rebecca Sandoz
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Trollie Estes
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Sandoz + Joelle Cuevas2346% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Sandoz + Amy St. Romain213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Guidotti + Kim Kocken213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kocken + Joelle Cuevas123 matchesnot enough data
Kim Kocken + Molly Burns303 matchesnot enough data
Molly Burns + Ann Boushie303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brooke Brown
22W–6L career · 9 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Ann Boushie
47W–18L career · 30 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Molly Burns
33W–13L career · 21 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Laura Bonanno
21W–16L career · 18 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Amy St. Romain
15W–11L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Emily Cristina
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Elizabeth Guidotti
9W–21L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emily Sorrel
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Haley
21W–3L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joelle Cuevas
26W–29L career · 26 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathie Daigle
15W–16L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Kocken
37W–25L career · 37 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsey Rogers
10W–5L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nela Otero
3W–17L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Sandoz
29W–18L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
Trollie Estes
15W–8L career · 23 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.