Teams

UPTA40C/Kohl/Riverside

2025 UPTA Combo 40 & Over - SC · 40 Combo Women - 8.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-18vs UPTA40C/Feininger/ReserveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPhyllis Bible / Mary Walsh vs Debbie Johnson / Lisa Maly4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Driscoll / Cristina Koehler vs Pamela Cabot / Cindy Eleftheriou5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-11vs UPTA40C/Norman/KrocWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Fite / Mary Walsh vs Tara Walters / Debbie Watson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesHeather Warner / Kim Brooks vs Charlotte Mason / Erin Brasington6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSharon Stasikelis / Teri Rushing vs Grace Coleman / Jennifer Shivers4-6, 3-6
2025-08-28vs UPTA40C/Feininger/ReserveLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeslie Fite / Mary Walsh vs Pam Marino / Bettilee Miller6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesHeather Warner / Teri Rushing vs Jill Coco / Melissa Cole5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesPhyllis Bible / Nancy Kohl vs Elleanore Feininger / Lisa Maly4-6, 2-6
2025-08-21vs UPTA40C/Norman/KrocLost 12
W#1 DoublesLeslie Fite / Kim Brooks vs Evelyn Bull / Gretchen Wise6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Driscoll / Cristina Koehler vs Julianne Foster / Debbie Watson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPhyllis Bible / Korrie Berens vs Grace Coleman / Jill Norman2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 Combo Women - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Teri Rushing
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.64
Cristina Koehler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Mary Anne Larkin
published
Heather Warner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Driscoll
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Korrie Berens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie Fite
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Phyllis Bible
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sharon Stasikelis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Driscoll + Cristina Koehler033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Teri Rushing
20W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Cristina Koehler
44W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Mary Anne Larkin
18W–9L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Heather Warner
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Janet Driscoll
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Korrie Berens
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Leslie Fite
8W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Phyllis Bible
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Stasikelis
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.