← Teams

MAC-Nearn/Harrington

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.25 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Christin Harrington
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Sheryl Wehner
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.21
Heather Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
2.86
Jane Nearn
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Madeleine Bourland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Elizabeth Large
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results9 ties
2024-06-28Lost 0–3
L#1 SinglesSheryl Wehner vs Amy Risch3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristin Harrington / Melinee Steck vs Melissa Jacobs / Jennifer Stevenson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Elizabeth Large vs Melanie Morris / Elena Buller7-6, 6-1
2024-06-23Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJane Nearn / Heather Edwards vs Tracey Beagle / Elicia Putnam6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSheryl Wehner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesChristin Harrington / Heidi Cronn vs Carmen Timberlake / Bess Jacobo6-1, 6-0
2024-06-16Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJane Nearn / Heather Edwards vs Jenell Henson / Ashley Sajadi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Elicia Putnam6-4, 7-6
2024-06-01Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesHeather Edwards / Christin Harrington vs Nicola Ash / Julia Henry6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSheryl Wehner / Heidi Cronn vs Jane Paulsen / Karin Owens6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Falvey / Elizabeth Large vs Karla Hendrickson / Michelle Ellett6-4, 7-5
2024-05-10Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesJane Nearn / Heather Edwards vs Shannon Davis / Jennifer Oh7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesSheryl Wehner / Madeleine Bourland vs Barbara Lolich / Kim Wallace6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-05Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesSheryl Wehner / Grace Hahn vs Sheila Sahu / Priscilla Paik6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMadeleine Bourland / Hannah O'Brien vs Minhhang Tran / Woojin Lee6-1, 6-1
2024-04-28Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesHeather Edwards / Heidi Cronn vs Katherine McMillan / Kimberly Downie7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHannah O'Brien / Elizabeth Large vs Julie Dicks / Mihee Park6-3, 7-5
2024-04-20Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesSheryl Wehner / Grace Hahn vs Raquel Rich / Priscilla Paik6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristin Harrington vs Kerry Forsell6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Nearn / Heather Edwards vs Sheila Sahu / Lori Andersen6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLinda Falvey / Madeleine Bourland vs Carol Kviz / Beth Bawnik6-1, 6-2
2024-04-13Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesHeidi Cronn / Elizabeth Large vs Teresa Zhao / Sumi Kim7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristin Harrington / Sheryl Wehner vs Dorothy Shin / Marilyn Burkhart7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJane Nearn / Heather Edwards vs Elena Walker / Athena Rubin6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Christin Harrington
81W–35L career
0%65%35%
3.56
3.5
Sheryl Wehner
22W–18L career
1%98%1%
3.28
3.5
Heather Edwards
95W–67L career · type A
2%98%0%
3.21
3
Jane Nearn
29W–23L career
0%95%5%
2.86
3
Madeleine Bourland
64W–53L career
2%98%0%
2.72
3
Elizabeth Large
19W–48L career
3%97%0%
2.71

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.