Teams

WP BLUE

2023 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 6.5 - ITA

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-08-20vs LTC-M NAVYSplit 11
L#2 DoublesEden Parker / Brian Gill vs Damon Balfour / Emily Sherman0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesTiffany Smink / Dan Smink vs Ron Arguello / Sue Curtin6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-08-13vs SKY BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesEden Parker / Andrew Goodwin vs Joy Kathleen Murphy / Chris Murphy6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTiffany Smink / Dan Smink vs Kim Brummond / Eric Brummond6-7, 3-6
2023-08-06vs CM PURPLEWon 10
W#3 DoublesTiffany Smink / Dan Smink vs Holly Flannigan / David Goetz6-2, 6-3
2023-07-30vs NJ BLACKLost 01
L#1 DoublesEden Parker / Andrew Goodwin vs Angela Hale / Rick Bonczynski4-6, 2-6
2023-07-23Won 10
W#3 DoublesEden Parker / Brad Webb vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-16vs CP GREENSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEden Parker / Andrew Goodwin vs Tamara Bianchi / Talwin Filholm7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesTiffany Smink / Dan Smink vs Dan Daly / Amy Twardowski3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-07-09vs NJ BLUEWon 10
W#3 DoublesEden Parker / Andrew Goodwin vs Heather Young / Steve Young6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Eden Parker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Kristin Nelson
published
3.36
Stephanie Baur
published
3.26
Brooke Webb
published 3.5
3.09
Dan Smink
published 3.5
3.06
Brad Webb
published 3
2.58
Tiffany Smink
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Richard Lynn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Webb + Brooke Webb31039% games−3.9% vs expected
Brad Webb + Stephanie Baur314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eden Parker
125W–58L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Kristin Nelson
43W–36L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
3.37
Stephanie Baur
34W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Brooke Webb
21W–27L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Dan Smink
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Brad Webb
31W–28L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
Tiffany Smink
24W–50L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
Richard Lynn
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.