Teams

Ai.Mikula18C

2023 Cap Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule16 played
2023-10-08vs Li.Hammond18CWon 30
W#1 DoublesSuzy Kaelin / Catherine Wilborne vs Meredith Walter / Melissa Weber6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Casey Novak vs Bonnie McDonald / Lisa Hammond6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Dahir / Mandy Steinhardt vs Deanna MacCormac / Rachel Garrison6-2, 7-5
2023-10-02vs Ba.Wilhelm18CWon 21
W#1 DoublesKim Peters / Mandy Steinhardt vs Angela Nesius / Rossana Prevost6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAimee Mikula / Casey Novak vs Courtney Carey / Lisa Pakela3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCatherine Wilborne / Tina Dahir vs Susan Furr / Robin Loundy6-2, 6-2
2023-10-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLauren Gentile / Catherine Wilborne vs Elizabeth Fogleman / Katherine Carver2-6, 1-6
2023-10-01vs Je.Komes18C5.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTina Dahir / Catherine Wilborne vs Jeannette Brown / Alison Sinclair0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Lagerstedt / Mandy Steinhardt vs Susan Cokas / Jenny Komes5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElisabeth Nixon / Casey Novak vs Alice Touchette / Rachel Sanders1-6, 2-6
2023-09-25Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMelissa Rini / Catherine Wilborne vs Kristin Baddour / Allison Gupton0-6, 6-7
2023-09-24vs Su.Braga18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Lagerstedt / Casey Novak vs Cassy Albertson / Paige Alford0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAimee Mikula / Catherine Wilborne vs Chrissy Hartsfield / Jill Orr6-4, 6-2
2023-09-18vs Ba.Wilhelm18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Lee / Casey Novak vs Alise Fredrickson / Sofia Switzer1-6, 1-6
2023-09-11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSherri Wichek / Catherine Wilborne vs Katie Clayton / Christine Stone0-6, 2-6
2023-09-10vs Kr.Gilreath18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKim Peters / Catherine Wilborne vs Rossi Evans / Jamie McCallum2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Lagerstedt / Elisabeth Nixon vs Erin Wynia / Mary Lewis James6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2023-09-03vs De.Farmer18C5.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMandy Steinhardt / Tina Dahir vs Dr Amy Linder / Kelsey Barrasso1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDiane Sugarman / Casey Novak vs Taqiyya Yasin / Megan Barrasso2-6, 1-6
2023-08-28vs Ka.King18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Blevins / Casey Novak vs Melanie Leach / Kristen Duke2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-27vs Ju.Andrews18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKim Peters / Mandy Steinhardt vs MA Allen / Brooke Jenkins7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSandy An / Michele Lagerstedt vs Janna Myers / Spruill Mayhew2-6, 4-6
2023-08-22vs Pa.Spell18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAimee Mikula / Mandy Steinhardt vs Pamela Spell / Shana Lentz6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichele Lagerstedt / Catherine Wilborne vs Melissa Green / Janice Lewis1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-08-14vs Ka.King18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesCatherine Wilborne / Lisa Bourget vs Kristen Duke / Rachel Sanders3-6, 2-6
2023-08-14Won 10
W#3 DoublesCasey Novak / Vina Jordano vs Leanna Murray / Karen Wahle7-6, 6-4
2023-08-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesCasey Novak / Terri Bartucca vs Christina LeLiever / Katie Landi6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kim Peters
published
2.85
Catherine Wilborne
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.82
Michele Lagerstedt
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.77
Casey Novak
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.67
Suzy Kaelin
published
2.56
Tina Dahir
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.55
Mandy Steinhardt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.43
Elisabeth Nixon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tina Dahir + Catherine Wilborne224 matchesnot enough data
Mandy Steinhardt + Casey Novak224 matchesnot enough data
Tina Dahir + Mandy Steinhardt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kim Peters
20W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
3
Catherine Wilborne
57W–46L career · 10 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Michele Lagerstedt
58W–62L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Casey Novak
114W–82L career · 9 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
Suzy Kaelin
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
12%88%1%
2.67
3
Tina Dahir
56W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Mandy Steinhardt
52W–90L career · 6 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Elisabeth Nixon
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
2.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.