Teams

Mesaris/Fox/LR/Rebs

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 1 League · 4.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-20vs Jackson/Francis/LR/CCLRLost 23
L#1 DoublesTim Miller / Eugene Clifford vs Joseph Dial / James Andersen3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesForrest Hickey vs Nicholas Bell6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristian Lenser / Stuart Riser vs Scott Bacon / Matt Dinehart6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLuis Nunez vs Ian Mcvinney6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLee Mesaris / Benjamin Heflin vs Jonathan Johnson / Vasuki Bharadwaj2-6, 5-7
2026-04-15vs Szeto/LR/RebsWon 50
W#1 DoublesMike Delgado / Andrew Fox vs Derrick Wilson / Landon Davis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJuan Carrion vs Larry Edwards II7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLee Mesaris / Luis Nunez vs Joe Shaver / Joseph Whitecotton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesBenjamin Heflin vs Patrick Szeto6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesForrest Hickey / Eugene Clifford vs Adam Raines / Lanny Landis6-3, 6-3
2026-04-14vs Padgett/Maumelle/RebsWon 40
W#1 DoublesKirk Bradshaw / Kristian Lenser vs Brian Allen / Jason Sykes6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesForrest Hickey / Stuart Riser vs Drew Taylor / Chris Williams6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEugene Clifford vs Henry Bethel6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesScott Eibes / Jay Heflin vs Jamey Rough / Will Thames6-1, 7-5
2026-04-09vs Jackson/Francis/LR/CCLRWon 41
W#1 DoublesScott Eibes / Kristian Lenser vs Vasuki Bharadwaj / Edwin Lowther6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLuis Nunez vs Blake Cunningham6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesParker Stearns / Stuart Riser vs Jacob McDaniels / Vijay Patel6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesEugene Clifford vs Ian Mcvinney2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesForrest Hickey / Tim Miller vs Samuel Jackson / Joseph Dial6-2, 6-4
2026-02-26vs Padgett/Maumelle/RebsWon 50
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Heflin / Jay Heflin vs Jamey Rough / Chris Williams6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJack Lewis vs Helmi Yatim7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKirk Bradshaw / Tim Miller vs Brian Allen / Drew Taylor6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJuan Carrion vs Parker Padgett6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStuart Riser / Mike Delgado vs Will Thames / Hakeem Yatim6-1, 6-1
2026-02-10vs Szeto/LR/RebsWon 50
W#1 DoublesForrest Hickey / Tim Miller vs Chase Guthrie / Laza Razafimanjato6-0, 3-1
W#1 SinglesBenjamin Heflin vs Larry Edwards II6-0, 4-4
W#2 DoublesParker Stearns / Lee Mesaris vs Patrick Szeto / Adam Raines6-3, 3-2
W#2 SinglesJack Lewis vs Aaron Burdine6-2, 3-1
W#3 DoublesJuan Carrion / Luis Nunez vs Lanny Landis / Joe Shaver6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.26 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.58
Forrest Hickey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.39
Luis Nunez
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.33
Kirk Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.31
Jay Heflin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.29
Stuart Riser
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Andrew Fox
published 4.5
Jack Lewis
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.24
Eugene Clifford
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.24
Benjamin Heflin
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.21
Kristian Lenser
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.20
Parker Stearns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.19
Mike Delgado
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.15
Lee Mesaris
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Juan Carrion
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Scott Eibes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jay Heflin + Benjamin Heflin4256% games+1.1% vs expected
Lee Mesaris + Mike Delgado224 matchesnot enough data
Lee Mesaris + Parker Stearns303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Forrest Hickey
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.58
Luis Nunez
25W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
4.39
Kirk Bradshaw
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.33
Jay Heflin
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.31
Stuart Riser
6W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Andrew Fox
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Jack Lewis
4W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Eugene Clifford
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
4.24
4.5
Benjamin Heflin
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Kristian Lenser
11W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
4.21
Parker Stearns
16W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
Mike Delgado
15W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19
Lee Mesaris
34W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.15
Juan Carrion
18W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.93
Scott Eibes
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.