Teams

Odell Weeks - Timmerman

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.40 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-12vs CSRATA/Stephanie RameyLost 03
L#1 DoublesAngela Magnuson / Brooke Homan vs Dana Davis / Diane Harrison4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDee Dee Redd / Gina Konn vs Lisa Rowland / Laurel Jones4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Hughes / Angie Osbon vs Michele Flanders / Donna Edwards0-6, 1-6
2025-03-05vs Odell Weeks - ElmshaeuserLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Homan / Dee Dee Redd vs Amy Maldonado / Kristen Elmshaeuser1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErin Runnels / Meghan Timmerman vs Janet Wallace / Agnes Hobson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLaura Donatelli / Melissa Bunney vs Susie Kneece / Julie Matson4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-25vs Riverview - SmithLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Beler / Meghan Timmerman vs Ashley Pracht / Lindsey Wilkinson3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hughes / Kristen Burns vs Allison Claire Clark / Praveena Venugopalan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrooke Homan / Angela Magnuson vs Sandra Burton Kelley / Jan Johnson5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#4 DoublesDee Dee Redd / Christy Tyner vs Pam Ciamillo / Jaclyn Bohanan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-05vs CSRATA/Stephanie RameySplit 11
W#1 DoublesBrooke Homan / Angela Magnuson vs Dana Davis / MacEy Miller6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristy Tyner / Dee Dee Redd vs Zuzana Berrong / Michele Flanders4-6, 4-6
2025-01-29vs Odell Weeks - ElmshaeuserSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAngela Magnuson / Brooke Homan vs Sharon McKool / Susan Podolin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErin Runnels / Dee Dee Redd vs Beth Weik / Agnes Hobson2-6, 3-6
2025-01-15vs Riverview - SmithLost 12
W#1 DoublesBrooke Homan / Angela Magnuson vs Ashley Pracht / Allison Claire Clark6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristen Burns / Michelle Hughes vs Suzanne Corley / Traci Wright5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Donatelli / Dee Dee Redd vs Talita Bernardi / Michell Davis5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Angela Magnuson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Brooke Homan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.33
Gina Konn
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.29
Erin Runnels
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Faris Connor
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Dee Dee Redd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
Kristen Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Christy Tyner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.01
Meghan Timmerman
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
2.87
Angie Osbon
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.75
Melissa Bunney
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Elizabeth Bushnell
usually #4 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Karen Beler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Donatelli
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Osbon + Melissa Bunney3253% games+4.4% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Angela Magnuson231060% games+2.5% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Melissa Bunney3346% games−6.8% vs expected
Dee Dee Redd + Christy Tyner4746% games−9.7% vs expected
Christy Tyner + Melissa Bunney1440% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bushnell + Melissa Bunney134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Magnuson
81W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Brooke Homan
69W–55L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Gina Konn
53W–38L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Erin Runnels
8W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Faris Connor
17W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
3.5
Dee Dee Redd
12W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Kristen Burns
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
3.5
Christy Tyner
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.06
Meghan Timmerman
29W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Angie Osbon
28W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Melissa Bunney
45W–56L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Elizabeth Bushnell
5W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Beler
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Donatelli
12W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.