Teams

Sports Mall-Kasteler

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 4.5W

10 players · average NTRP 4.36 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-13vs Ivory Ridge-StonerWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLynette Duran / Randi Welch vs Amy Davis / Winifred Rawstorne6-0, 6-1
2021-12-06vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-UtgaardLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesBre Debry / Katy Alder vs Jill Jensen Clark / Stephanie Tonin5-7, 4-5
2021-11-29vs Salt Lake Tennis-KempWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesRandi Welch / Lynette Duran vs Emily Wallace / Nanette Heath7-6, 6-2
2021-11-15vs Ivory Ridge-StonerWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesBre Debry / Katy Alder vs Shanda Stoner / Kara Johnson6-1, 6-4
2021-11-08vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-UtgaardLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesBre Debry / Katy Alder vs Lisa Garland / Stephanie Tonin0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-11-01vs Salt Lake Tennis-KempWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesLynette Duran / Randi Welch vs Kandice Taylor / Cyndi Jones6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.5W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CMTA @ Liberty Park-Utgaard4211719137
2Sports Mall-Kasteler3310817131
3Ivory Ridge-Stoner3310820157
4Salt Lake Tennis-Kemp2451329176

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Lynette Duran
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.28
Jen Langston
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Amy Boren
published 4.5
Amy Hansen
published 4.5
Bre Debry
published 4.5
3.85
Tiffany Kasteler
published
3.74
Elizabeth Thomas
published 4
3.73
Katy Alder
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 4
Katie Zimmerman
published
Randi Welch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jen Langston + Amy Boren151555% games+5.0% vs expected
Bre Debry + Katy Alder121247% games−2.0% vs expected
Katy Alder + Amy Hansen134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lynette Duran
186W–144L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Jen Langston
144W–110L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Amy Boren
37W–25L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Amy Hansen
43W–44L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4.5
Bre Debry
26W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tiffany Kasteler
166W–104L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Elizabeth Thomas
31W–46L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Katy Alder
81W–81L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Katie Zimmerman
21W–21L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Randi Welch
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.